Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, School of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Eval Health Prof. 2012 Dec;35(4):440-6. doi: 10.1177/0163278712448772. Epub 2012 May 21.
The Listening Style Profile (LSP-16) measures people's self-reported preferences for four listening styles that we habitually use when we listen. Research in this area is important for health care education since listening is a fundamental skill in all the health care professions. The aim of this study was to investigate the factor structure of the LSP-16's subscales when completed by a group of respondents from a large Australian university. Data from the LSP-16 completed by 860 undergraduate health science students enrolled in eight different courses (response rate of 59%) were analyzed using maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. The model fit indices of the maximum likelihood analysis demonstrate that the resultant models did not fit the data well. One item exhibited model misfit and reliability estimates and factor loadings were modest. The confirmatory factor analysis results did not support the overall latent factor structure of the LSP-16 as initially proposed by its authors. Further work is required to examine the underlying construct validity and other measurement properties of the LSP-16.
倾听风格量表（LSP-16）测量人们在倾听时习惯性使用的四种倾听风格的自我报告偏好。由于倾听是所有医疗保健专业的基本技能，因此该领域的研究对于医疗保健教育很重要。本研究旨在调查一组来自澳大利亚一所大型大学的受访者完成 LSP-16 子量表的因子结构。使用最大似然验证性因子分析对 860 名入读八门不同课程的本科健康科学学生（响应率为 59%）完成的 LSP-16 数据进行了分析。最大似然分析的模型拟合指数表明，所得模型与数据拟合不佳。有一个项目表现出模型不匹配，可靠性估计和因子载荷适中。验证性因子分析结果不支持 LSP-16 的最初提出的整体潜在因子结构。需要进一步研究以检验 LSP-16 的潜在构念效度和其他测量特性。
