• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队任务分析:使用团队相关性和团队工作流程作为团队任务相互依赖的度量标准来区分任务。

Team task analysis: differentiating between tasks using team relatedness and team workflow as metrics of team task interdependence.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4235, USA.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2012 Apr;54(2):277-95. doi: 10.1177/0018720811435234.

DOI:10.1177/0018720811435234
PMID:22624293
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

As a constructive replication and extension of Arthur, Edwards, Bell, Villado, and Bennett (2005), the objective of the current study was to further investigate the efficacy of team relatedness and team workflow ratings (along with their composite) as metrics of interdependence.

BACKGROUND

Although an analysis of task and job interdependence has important implications and uses in domains such as job design, selection, and training, the job analysis literature has been slow to develop an effective method to identify team-based tasks and jobs.

METHOD

To achieve the study's objectives, 140 F-16 fighter pilots (35 four-person teams) rated 34 task and activity statements in terms of their team relatedness and team workflow.

RESULTS

The results indicated that team relatedness and team workflow effectively differentiated between tasks with varying levels of interdependency (as identified by instructor pilots who served as subject matter experts) within the same job. In addition, teams that accurately perceived the level of interdependency performed better on a four-ship F-16 flight-training program than those that did not.

CONCLUSION

Team relatedness and team workflow ratings can effectively differentiate between tasks with varying levels of interdependency.

APPLICATION

Like traditional individual task or job analysis, this information can serve as the basis for specified human resource functions and interventions, and as diagnostic indicators as well.

摘要

目的

作为对 Arthur、Edwards、Bell、Villado 和 Bennett(2005 年)的建设性复制和扩展,本研究的目的是进一步研究团队关联性和团队工作流程评分(以及它们的综合评分)作为相互依存性指标的有效性。

背景

尽管对任务和工作相互依存关系的分析在工作设计、选择和培训等领域具有重要意义和用途,但工作分析文献在开发有效方法来识别基于团队的任务和工作方面进展缓慢。

方法

为了实现研究目标,140 名 F-16 战斗机飞行员(35 个四人团队)根据团队关联性和团队工作流程对 34 项任务和活动陈述进行了评分。

结果

结果表明,团队关联性和团队工作流程能够有效地区分同一工作中具有不同相互依存程度的任务(由担任主题专家的教练飞行员确定)。此外,与那些没有准确感知相互依存程度的团队相比,准确感知相互依存程度的团队在四架 F-16 飞行训练计划中的表现更好。

结论

团队关联性和团队工作流程评分可以有效地区分具有不同相互依存程度的任务。

应用

与传统的个体任务或工作分析一样,这些信息可以作为特定人力资源职能和干预措施的基础,并作为诊断指标。

相似文献

1
Team task analysis: differentiating between tasks using team relatedness and team workflow as metrics of team task interdependence.团队任务分析:使用团队相关性和团队工作流程作为团队任务相互依赖的度量标准来区分任务。
Hum Factors. 2012 Apr;54(2):277-95. doi: 10.1177/0018720811435234.
2
Team task analysis: identifying tasks and jobs that are team based.团队任务分析:识别基于团队的任务和工作。
Hum Factors. 2005 Fall;47(3):654-69. doi: 10.1518/001872005774860087.
3
Effects of automation of information-processing functions on teamwork.信息处理功能自动化对团队协作的影响。
Hum Factors. 2005 Spring;47(1):50-66. doi: 10.1518/0018720053653776.
4
Instructor and Trainee Judgments of Cohesion in Mixed-Gender Military Teams.教官与学员对混合性别军事团队凝聚力的判断
Mil Med. 2019 May 1;184(5-6):e131-e136. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy288.
5
Analyzing team performance: in the eye of the beholder?分析团队表现:旁观者眼中的看法?
Mil Psychol. 1996;8(3):235-45. doi: 10.1207/s15327876mp0803_7.
6
Computerized Tests of Team Performance and Crew Coordination Suitable for Military/Aviation Settings.适用于军事/航空环境的团队绩效和机组人员协作的计算机化测试。
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017 Aug 1;88(8):722-729. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4786.2017.
7
Team effectiveness: beyond skills and cognitive ability.团队效能:超越技能和认知能力
J Appl Psychol. 1999 Jun;84(3):376-89. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.376.
8
On-the-fly scheduling as a manifestation of partial-order planning and dynamic task values.动态调度作为偏序规划和动态任务值的一种表现形式。
Hum Factors. 2014 Sep;56(6):1093-112. doi: 10.1177/0018720814525629.
9
Team performance in networked supervisory control of unmanned air vehicles: effects of automation, working memory, and communication content.网络化监控无人机的团队绩效:自动化、工作记忆和通信内容的影响。
Hum Factors. 2014 May;56(3):463-75. doi: 10.1177/0018720813496269.
10
Implicit Coordination Strategies for Effective Team Communication.有效团队沟通的隐性协调策略
Hum Factors. 2016 Jun;58(4):595-610. doi: 10.1177/0018720816639712. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategic Team Science Promotes Collaboration and Practice-Based Research at the Research Centers in Minority Institutions.战略团队科学促进少数民族机构研究中心的合作和基于实践的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;20(6):4800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064800.
2
Analysis of shared cognitive tasks in the application of non-invasive ventilation to patients with COPD exacerbation.分析在 COPD 加重患者应用无创通气中的共同认知任务。
J Interprof Care. 2023 Jul-Aug;37(4):576-587. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2118681. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
3
Factors Influencing Team Performance: What Can Support Teams in High-Performance Sport Learn from Other Industries? A Systematic Scoping Review.
影响团队绩效的因素:高水平运动中支持团队的因素能从其他行业中学到什么?一项系统的范围综述。
Sports Med Open. 2022 Feb 22;8(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00406-7.
4
Improving Team-Based Decision Making Using Data Analytics and Informatics: Protocol for a Collaborative Decision Support Design.利用数据分析和信息学改进基于团队的决策:协作式决策支持设计方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Nov 27;8(11):e16047. doi: 10.2196/16047.
5
DEVELOPING, SUSTAINING, AND MAXIMIZING TEAM EFFECTIVENESS: AN INTEGRATIVE, DYNAMIC PERSPECTIVE OF TEAM DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS.发展、维持并最大化团队效能:团队发展干预措施的综合动态视角
Acad Manag Ann. 2018 Jun;12(2):688-724. doi: 10.5465/annals.2016.0045. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
6
Personality characteristics that are valued in teams: Not always "more is better"?团队中受重视的人格特征:并非“越多越好”?
Int J Psychol. 2019 Oct;54(5):638-649. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12511. Epub 2018 Jul 16.