• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

金属压配式桡骨头置换术治疗肘关节不稳定损伤的短期至中期疗效

Short- to mid-term results of metallic press-fit radial head arthroplasty in unstable injuries of the elbow.

作者信息

Flinkkilä T, Kaisto T, Sirniö K, Hyvönen P, Leppilahti J

机构信息

Oulu University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, PL21, FIN-90029 OYS, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jun;94(6):805-10. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B6.28176.

DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.94B6.28176
PMID:22628596
Abstract

We assessed the short- to mid-term survival of metallic press-fit radial head prostheses in patients with radial head fractures and acute traumatic instability of the elbow. The medical records of 42 patients (16 males, 26 females) with a mean age of 56 years (23 to 85) with acute unstable elbow injuries, including a fracture of the radial head requiring metallic replacement of the radial head, were reviewed retrospectively. Survival of the prosthesis was assessed from the radiographs of 37 patients after a mean follow-up of 50 months (12 to 107). The functional results of 31 patients were assessed using range-of-movement, Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the RAND 36-item health survey. At the most recent follow-up 25 prostheses were still well fixed, nine had been removed because of loosening, and three remained implanted but were loose. The mean time from implantation to loosening was 11 months (2 to 24). Radiolucent lines that developed around the prosthesis before removal were mild in three patients, moderate in one and severe in five. Range of movement parameters and mass grip strength were significantly lower in the affected elbow than in the unaffected side. The mean MEPS score was 86 (40 to 100) and the mean DASH score was 23 (0 to 81). According to RAND-36 scores, patients had more pain and lower physical function scores than normal population values. Loosening of press-fit radial head prostheses is common, occurs early, often leads to severe osteolysis of the proximal radius, and commonly requires removal of the prosthesis.

摘要

我们评估了金属压配式桡骨头假体在桡骨头骨折并伴有急性创伤性肘关节不稳定患者中的短期至中期生存率。回顾性分析了42例急性肘关节不稳定损伤患者(16例男性,26例女性)的病历,平均年龄56岁(23至85岁),其中包括桡骨头骨折需要金属置换桡骨头的患者。对37例患者进行了平均50个月(12至107个月)的随访,通过X光片评估假体的生存率。使用活动范围、梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS)、上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分以及兰德36项健康调查问卷对31例患者的功能结果进行评估。在最近一次随访时,25个假体仍固定良好,9个因松动而被取出,3个仍植入但已松动。从植入到松动的平均时间为11个月(2至24个月)。取出前假体周围出现的透光线,3例患者为轻度,1例为中度,5例为重度。患侧肘关节的活动范围参数和握力明显低于未受影响侧。平均MEPS评分为86分(40至100分),平均DASH评分为23分(0至81分)。根据兰德36项评分,患者比正常人群有更多疼痛且身体功能评分更低。压配式桡骨头假体松动很常见,发生较早,常导致桡骨近端严重骨溶解,且通常需要取出假体。

相似文献

1
Short- to mid-term results of metallic press-fit radial head arthroplasty in unstable injuries of the elbow.金属压配式桡骨头置换术治疗肘关节不稳定损伤的短期至中期疗效
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jun;94(6):805-10. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B6.28176.
2
Is a silastic radial head still a reasonable option?硅橡胶桡骨头是否仍是合理的选择?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr;469(4):1061-70. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1672-2.
3
Radial head replacement for acute complex fractures: what are the rate and risks factors for revision or removal?桡骨头置换治疗急性复杂骨折:翻修或取出的发生率和风险因素有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2136-43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3516-y.
4
Comminuted fractures of the radial head: resection or prosthesis?桡骨头粉碎性骨折:切除术还是假体植入?
Injury. 2016 Sep;47 Suppl 3:S29-S34. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30603-9.
5
Metallic Press-fit Radial Head Replacement for Radial Head Fractures.用于桡骨头骨折的金属压配式桡骨头置换术
Orthopedics. 2019 Nov 1;42(6):e545-e551. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190604-07. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
6
Clinical and radiographic comparisons of two different radial head implant designs.两种不同桡骨小头植入物设计的临床和影像学比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Aug;22(8):1108-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.011. Epub 2013 May 7.
7
A retrospective comparative cohort study of radial head arthroplasty versus resection in complex elbow dislocations.桡骨头置换与切除术治疗复杂肘关节脱位的回顾性对比队列研究。
Injury. 2020 Apr;51 Suppl 1:S89-S93. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
8
[Radial Head Replacement: Management of Elbow and Forearm Instability after Comminuted Radial Head Fractures Associated with Elbow Dislocation].[桡骨头置换:肘关节脱位合并粉碎性桡骨头骨折后肘关节和前臂不稳定的处理]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024;91(2):96-102. doi: 10.55095/ACHOT2024/012.
9
Primary cemented bipolar radial head prostheses for acute elbow injuries with comminuted radial head fractures: mid-term results of 37 patients.用于急性肘关节损伤伴桡骨头粉碎性骨折的初次骨水泥固定双极桡骨头假体:37例患者的中期结果
Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Apr;103(1):91-97. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0576-2. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
Comminuted fractures of the radial head treated by the Judet floating radial head prosthesis.采用Judet浮动桡骨头假体治疗桡骨头粉碎性骨折。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jun;88(6):760-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6.17415.

引用本文的文献

1
Good outcomes of bipolar radial head arthroplasty for comminuted radial head fractures : a cohort study of 64 patients with an average 5.2-year follow-up.双极桡骨头置换术治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折的良好疗效:一项对64例患者平均随访5.2年的队列研究
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Jun 18;6(6):724-733. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2024-0202.R2.
2
The clinical outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation for Mason-Johnston type IV fractures of the radial head.桡骨头Mason-Johnston IV型骨折切开复位内固定术的临床疗效。
Front Surg. 2025 May 19;12:1506125. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1506125. eCollection 2025.
3
Outcomes of press-fit radial head arthroplasty in unconstructable radial head fractures with associated elbow injuries: An average 5-year follow up.
不可修复的伴有肘部损伤的桡骨头骨折采用压配式桡骨头置换术的疗效:平均5年随访
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Aug 8:17585732241268904. doi: 10.1177/17585732241268904.
4
Does simultaneous comminuted fracture of both radial ends represent a distinct fracture pattern?桡骨两端粉碎性骨折是否代表一种独特的骨折类型?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Feb;30(2):135-141. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.19392.
5
Comparing the outcomes of tripod technique and locked plate fixation for the treatment of Mason type 3 radial head fractures.比较三脚架技术和锁定钢板固定治疗 Mason 3 型桡骨头骨折的疗效。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023 Sep 20;34(3):716-723. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1161.
6
Retrospective review of pyrocarbon radial head replacement.焦碳酸桡骨头置换术的回顾性研究。
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2021 Sep 3;1(4):376-380. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.08.006. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Anatomic Monopolar Press-fit Radial Head Arthroplasty; High Rate of Loosening at Mid-Term Follow Up.解剖型单极压配式桡骨头置换术;中期随访时松动率较高。
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Apr;15(2):207-217. doi: 10.1177/17585732221080768. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
8
Clinical and radiological outcome of Mason-Johnston types III and IV radial head fractures treated by an on-table reconstruction.经桌上重建治疗 Mason-Johnston 类型 III 和 IV 桡骨头骨折的临床和放射学结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Nov 19;17(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03394-w.
9
Patient- and Procedure-Specific Variables Associated With Removal or Revision of Radial Head Arthroplasty.与桡骨头置换术的移除或翻修相关的患者和手术特定变量。
Perm J. 2022 Jun 29;26(2):69-76. doi: 10.7812/TPP/21.191. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
10
Survivorship of anatomic press-fit short-stem radial head replacement with a pyrocarbon bearing.采用热解碳轴承的解剖型压配短柄桡骨头置换术的生存率
Shoulder Elbow. 2022 Aug;14(4):426-433. doi: 10.1177/17585732211024182. Epub 2021 Jun 17.