• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于急性肘关节损伤伴桡骨头粉碎性骨折的初次骨水泥固定双极桡骨头假体:37例患者的中期结果

Primary cemented bipolar radial head prostheses for acute elbow injuries with comminuted radial head fractures: mid-term results of 37 patients.

作者信息

Laun R, Tanner S, Grassmann J-P, Schneppendahl J, Wild M, Hakimi M, Windolf J, Jungbluth P

机构信息

Department of Trauma, Orthopedics and Handsurgery, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Rudower Straße 48, 12351, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Trauma and Handsurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Apr;103(1):91-97. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0576-2. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1007/s12306-018-0576-2
PMID:30515741
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radial head arthroplasty represents a widely accepted treatment for elbow injuries with non-reconstructible radial head fractures. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to assess mid-term results of patients with clearly defined elbow injuries including type III fractures of the radial head according to Mason's classification type III after primary arthroplasty using a cemented bipolar design.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 45 cases a primary cemented bipolar arthroplasty of the radial head was implanted for elbow injuries combined with an acute Mason type III radial head fracture. In all patients associated fractures were detected with preoperative CT scans and ligamentous injuries were evaluated and both were addressed intraoperatively based on a standardized algorithm. Patients with associated injuries other than coronoid fractures and collateral ligament tears were excluded from this study to obtain a more homogenous sample. Clinical and radiological assessment was performed on thirty-seven patients at an average of 5.6 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

DASH Score, functional rating index of Broberg and Morrey, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Mayo Modified Wrist Score confirmed good-to-excellent results in most of the patients. Compared to the unaffected arm range of motion and grip strength were slightly reduced. No elbow instability or loosening of the prosthesis, and minor degenerative changes were detected in a few cases.

CONCLUSION

Primary cemented bipolar arthroplasty for type III fractures according to Mason's classification in an elbow injury pattern only including associated coronoid fractures and/or ligamentous tears resulted in good-to-excellent mid-term results. These results suggest that primary bipolar radial head arthroplasty combined with distinct treatment of all associated injuries provides good functional outcomes concerning range of motion, elbow stability, and strength in this cohort. However, the associated injuries may influence clinical and radiological outcome and need to be detected, classified, and treated carefully.

摘要

背景

桡骨头置换术是治疗不可重建的桡骨头骨折所致肘部损伤的一种广泛接受的治疗方法。这项回顾性多中心研究的目的是评估在使用骨水泥型双极设计进行初次置换术后,患有明确肘部损伤(包括根据梅森分类法III型的桡骨头III型骨折)患者的中期结果。

材料与方法

45例因肘部损伤合并急性梅森III型桡骨头骨折而接受了初次骨水泥型双极桡骨头置换术。所有患者术前均通过CT扫描检测相关骨折,并评估韧带损伤情况,术中均根据标准化算法进行处理。本研究排除了除冠状突骨折和侧副韧带撕裂以外有其他相关损伤的患者,以获得更同质的样本。对37例患者在术后平均5.6年进行了临床和影像学评估。

结果

DASH评分、布罗伯格和莫里功能评分指数、梅奥肘关节功能评分以及梅奥改良腕关节评分证实大多数患者结果良好至优秀。与未受伤的手臂相比,活动范围和握力略有降低。未发现肘关节不稳定或假体松动,少数病例检测到轻微退变改变。

结论

对于仅包括相关冠状突骨折和/或韧带撕裂的肘部损伤模式,根据梅森分类法对III型骨折进行初次骨水泥型双极置换术可获得良好至优秀的中期结果。这些结果表明,初次双极桡骨头置换术结合对所有相关损伤的明确治疗,在该队列中可在活动范围、肘关节稳定性和力量方面提供良好的功能结果。然而,相关损伤可能会影响临床和影像学结果,需要仔细检测、分类和治疗。

相似文献

1
Primary cemented bipolar radial head prostheses for acute elbow injuries with comminuted radial head fractures: mid-term results of 37 patients.用于急性肘关节损伤伴桡骨头粉碎性骨折的初次骨水泥固定双极桡骨头假体:37例患者的中期结果
Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Apr;103(1):91-97. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0576-2. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
2
Midterm outcomes of a short-cemented bipolar radial head arthroplasty, in a cohort of 56 cases with minimum 2-years follow-up.56 例短柄双极人工桡骨头置换术患者的中期随访结果,随访时间至少 2 年。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 May;110(3):103716. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103716. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
3
Terrible triad injuries of the elbow: does the coronoid always need to be fixed?肘部三联征损伤:是否需要固定喙突?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2084-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3471-7.
4
Arthroplasty with a metal radial head for unreconstructible fractures of the radial head.采用金属桡骨头置换术治疗不可重建的桡骨头骨折。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug;83(8):1201-11. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200108000-00010.
5
[Our Initial Experience with Radial Head Replacement].[我们进行桡骨头置换的初步经验]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(5):362-367.
6
Mason type III radial head fractures treated by anatomic radial head arthroplasty: Is this a safe treatment option?采用解剖型桡骨头置换术治疗的梅森III型桡骨头骨折:这是一种安全的治疗选择吗?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
7
[Radial head prosthesis - treatment of comminuted radial head fractures combined with elbow instability].[桡骨头假体——治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折合并肘关节不稳定]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 Nov-Dec;146(6):760-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038976. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
8
A retrospective comparative cohort study of radial head arthroplasty versus resection in complex elbow dislocations.桡骨头置换与切除术治疗复杂肘关节脱位的回顾性对比队列研究。
Injury. 2020 Apr;51 Suppl 1:S89-S93. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
Comminuted fractures of the radial head: resection or prosthesis?桡骨头粉碎性骨折:切除术还是假体植入?
Injury. 2016 Sep;47 Suppl 3:S29-S34. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30603-9.
10
Fixation versus replacement of radial head in terrible triad: is there a difference in elbow stability and prognosis?桡骨头固定与置换治疗三联征:肘关节稳定性和预后是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2128-35. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3331-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Good outcomes of bipolar radial head arthroplasty for comminuted radial head fractures : a cohort study of 64 patients with an average 5.2-year follow-up.双极桡骨头置换术治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折的良好疗效:一项对64例患者平均随访5.2年的队列研究
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Jun 18;6(6):724-733. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2024-0202.R2.
2
Comment on "Isolated MASON type-III radial head fractures: radial head arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation - clinical and radiological outcomes with five to fourteen years of follow up".对《孤立性MASON III型桡骨头骨折:桡骨头置换术还是切开复位内固定术——5至14年随访的临床和影像学结果》的评论
Int Orthop. 2025 May;49(5):1261-1262. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06492-6. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comminuted fractures of the radial head: resection or prosthesis?桡骨头粉碎性骨折:切除术还是假体植入?
Injury. 2016 Sep;47 Suppl 3:S29-S34. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30603-9.
2
Long term results after bipolar radial head arthroplasty.双极桡骨头置换术后的长期结果。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2016 Aug;82(2):382-388.
3
Cemented bipolar radial head arthroplasty: midterm follow-up results.骨水泥型双极桡骨头置换术:中期随访结果
Isolated MASON type-III radial head fractures: radial head arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation - clinical and radiological outcomes with five to fourteen years of follow up.
孤立性MASON III型桡骨头骨折:桡骨头置换术或切开复位内固定术——5至14年随访的临床和影像学结果
Int Orthop. 2025 Mar;49(3):767-777. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06445-z. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
4
Uncementing the status quo: systematic review of a loose-fit, polished stem radial head prosthesis shows stable clinical results in complex elbow injuries with a concomitant radial head fracture.打破现状:对松动、抛光的桡骨小头假体的系统评价显示,在伴有桡骨小头骨折的复杂肘关节损伤中,该假体具有稳定的临床结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Oct 19;19(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05160-6.
5
Open reduction and internal fixation of modified Mason type III/IV radial head fractures with more than three fragments: an analysis of the clinical outcome and reoperation rate.改良 Mason 型 III/IV 型桡骨头骨折伴三块以上骨折块的切开复位内固定:临床疗效及再次手术率分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Feb;34(2):1121-1130. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03772-y. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis on different stem fixation methods of radial head prostheses during long-term follow-up.一项关于桡骨头假体不同柄部固定方法长期随访的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Nov 1;10:1041531. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1041531. eCollection 2022.
7
Clinical long-term results of radial head arthroplasty in comminuted radial head fractures.粉碎性桡骨头骨折行桡骨头置换术的临床长期疗效
Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Jun;107(2):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s12306-022-00742-1. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
8
Acute radial head replacement with bipolar prostheses: midterm results.双极假体治疗急性桡骨头置换:中期结果。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Feb;31(2):309-318. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02774-4. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Nov;25(11):1829-1838. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
4
Failure of a Unipolar Radial Head Prosthesis Due to Component Dissociation.单极桡骨头假体因部件分离而失效。
Orthopedics. 2016 Jul 1;39(4):e771-4. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160513-01. Epub 2016 May 20.
5
Factors associated with removal of a radial head prosthesis placed for acute trauma.与因急性创伤而置入的桡骨头假体取出相关的因素。
Injury. 2016 Jun;47(6):1253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.02.023. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
6
Outcomes of bipolar radial head prosthesis to treat complex radial head fractures in 22 patients with a mean follow-up of 50 months.采用双极桡骨头假体治疗22例复杂桡骨头骨折患者的疗效,平均随访50个月。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Nov;100(7):703-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.019. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
7
Radial head replacement for acute complex fractures: what are the rate and risks factors for revision or removal?桡骨头置换治疗急性复杂骨折:翻修或取出的发生率和风险因素有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2136-43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3516-y.
8
Radial head, radiocapitellar and total elbow arthroplasties: a review of recent literature.桡骨头、桡肱小头和全肘人工关节置换术:对近期文献的回顾。
Injury. 2014 Feb;45(2):428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.019. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
9
Fractures of the radial head.桡骨头骨折。
Bone Joint J. 2013 Feb;95-B(2):151-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.29877.
10
Radial head replacement for radial head fractures.桡骨头置换治疗桡骨头骨折。
J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Jun;27(6):e137-40. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318269b7b7.