Suppr超能文献

毛囊镜检查与毛发计数法在诊断女性雄激素性脱发中的价值

Value of trichoscopy versus trichogram for diagnosis of female androgenetic alopecia.

作者信息

Galliker Nadja A, Trüeb Ralph M

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Trichology. 2012 Jan;4(1):19-22. doi: 10.4103/0974-7753.96080.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Female androgenetic alopecia (FAGA) is a frequent cause of hair loss in women. Standard diagnostic methods are clinical inspection, pull test, and trichogram. It has been suggested that scalp dermoscopy (trichoscopy) revealing diversity of hair shaft diameter >20% is diagnostic of FAGA.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the value of trichoscopy as compared to the trichogram for the diagnosis of FAGA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective case study of 162 women with the complaint of hair loss who underwent trichoscopic examination and trichograms.

RESULTS

Of all women diagnosed FAGA (55%), 62% were diagnosed by trichogram, 72% by trichoscopy with a cut-off point of 20%, and 100% irrespective of the degree of diversity of hair shaft diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Trichoscopy is a valuable and superior method to the trichogram for diagnosis of FAGA, especially in early cases, with the highest yield irrespective of the suggested cut-off of 20% diversity of hair shaft.

摘要

背景

女性雄激素性脱发(FAGA)是女性脱发的常见原因。标准诊断方法包括临床检查、拔毛试验和毛发镜检。有人提出,头皮皮肤镜检查(毛发镜检查)显示毛干直径差异>20%可诊断为FAGA。

目的

评估毛发镜检查与毛发镜检在诊断FAGA方面的价值。

患者与方法

对162例主诉脱发的女性进行回顾性病例研究,这些女性均接受了毛发镜检查和毛发镜检。

结果

在所有被诊断为FAGA的女性(55%)中,62%通过毛发镜检确诊,72%通过毛干直径差异截断值为20%的毛发镜检查确诊,无论毛干直径差异程度如何,1‍‍00%可确诊。

结论

对于FAGA的诊断,毛发镜检查是一种有价值且优于毛发镜检的方法,尤其是在早期病例中,无论毛干直径差异建议截断值为20%与否,其诊断率最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/180a/3358933/b1365a5bcf57/IJT-4-19-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验