Hill W Trey, Brase Gary L
Department of Psychology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(12):2343-68. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.687004. Epub 2012 May 25.
The thesis that the mind is better prepared to process frequencies-as compared to other numerical formats-continues to be debated. A recent aspect of this issue is the role of numeracy (numerical literacy; one's ability to understand and work with numerical information) and specifically the argument that individual differences in numeracy interact with numerical formats. This interaction, either that frequencies improve performance only for those of low numeracy or that frequencies work only for those of high numeracy, would suggest that better performance using frequencies could be due to (nonevolutionary) numeracy effects. The three present studies revisited prior work with cumulative probability, Bayesian reasoning, and scenario risk assessments to study the effects of numeracy on frequency facilitation. Results from these experiments consistently failed to replicate previous findings of interactions; however, a more consistent finding emerged of a straightforward frequency effect. The lack of interactions and observations of frequency main effects lend support to the evolutionary explanation of the frequency effect. In addition, some possible statistical processes are proposed to explain the observation of interactions in past studies.
与其他数字形式相比,大脑更善于处理频率这一论点仍在争论中。这个问题最近的一个方面是算术能力(数字素养;一个人理解和处理数字信息的能力)的作用,特别是关于算术能力的个体差异与数字形式相互作用的论点。这种相互作用,即频率仅对低算术能力者提高表现,或者频率仅对高算术能力者起作用,这表明使用频率时表现更好可能是由于(非进化的)算术效应。目前的三项研究重新审视了先前关于累积概率、贝叶斯推理和情景风险评估的工作,以研究算术能力对频率促进的影响。这些实验的结果始终未能重复先前关于相互作用的发现;然而,出现了一个更一致的发现,即直接的频率效应。缺乏相互作用以及频率主效应的观察结果支持了对频率效应的进化解释。此外,还提出了一些可能的统计过程来解释过去研究中观察到的相互作用。