• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术:单中心系列研究。

Carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis: a single-center series.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.

出版信息

J Neuroradiol. 2013 Mar;40(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 May 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.neurad.2012.03.003
PMID:22633044
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Carotid angioplasty with stenting (CAS) in patients with carotid stenosis (CS) has become more restricted in France especially since the disclosure of such studies as EVA-3S and Stent-supported percutaneous angioplasty of the carotid artery versus endarterectomy (SPACE). This report is of a series of CS cases contraindicated for endarterectomy that underwent CAS at a French center of interventional neuroradiology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients with symptomatic CS more than 60% consecutively submitted to CAS between September 2008 and February 2011. The primary endpoint was either death or stroke within 30 days of the procedure; a secondary goal was to identify any possible factors that might have influenced the success and outcome of the intervention.

RESULTS

The overall periprocedural stroke/death rate at 30 days was 5.4% (three out of 55 patients), with three non-disabling strokes and no deaths. Twenty-seven patients (49.1%) were treated with a cerebral protection device (CPD). Stent placement was achieved in all cases. Open- and closed-cell stents were implanted in 40 (72.7%) and 15 procedures (27.3%), respectively. Neither the use of a CPD, the carotid stent cell design nor any anatomical or technical factors were associated with a lower risk of stroke or death within 30 days of CAS.

CONCLUSION

CAS in symptomatic patients with CS contraindicated for endarterectomy in this selected French series proved feasible and safe, with acceptable levels of morbidity. Use of a CPD, type of stent (open- or closed-cell), and anatomical and technical factors had no influence on the success of the procedure or the outcome within 30 days of the operation.

摘要

目的

颈动脉狭窄(CS)患者的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)在法国受到了更多限制,尤其是在 EVA-3S 和颈动脉支架成形术与内膜切除术(SPACE)等研究结果公布之后。本报告是一家法国介入神经放射学中心对不适合进行内膜切除术的 CS 病例进行 CAS 治疗的系列病例。

患者和方法

2008 年 9 月至 2011 年 2 月期间,连续有 55 例症状性 CS 超过 60%的患者接受了 CAS。主要终点为术后 30 天内死亡或中风;次要目标是确定任何可能影响干预成功率和结果的因素。

结果

30 天内的围手术期总卒中/死亡率为 5.4%(55 例患者中有 3 例),有 3 例非致残性中风,无死亡病例。27 例(49.1%)患者使用了脑保护装置(CPD)。所有病例均成功放置了支架。40 例(72.7%)植入开环支架,15 例(27.3%)植入闭环支架。CPD 的使用、颈动脉支架的细胞设计或任何解剖学或技术因素均与 CAS 术后 30 天内的卒中或死亡风险降低无关。

结论

在这项法国的选择病例系列中,对不适合进行内膜切除术的有症状 CS 患者进行 CAS 证明是可行和安全的,且发病率可接受。CPD 的使用、支架类型(开环或闭环)、解剖学和技术因素对手术成功率和术后 30 天内的结果没有影响。

相似文献

1
Carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis: a single-center series.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术:单中心系列研究。
J Neuroradiol. 2013 Mar;40(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 May 24.
2
Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial.采用改良系统的颈动脉支架置入术治疗伴有远端栓塞保护装置的结果:高危颈动脉内膜切除术患者颈动脉支架置入术保护(PROTECT)试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):968-976.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
3
Remote pre-procedural ischemic stroke as the greatest risk in carotid‑stenting‑associated stroke and death: a single center's experience.远程术前缺血性卒中是颈动脉支架置入相关卒中和死亡的最大风险:单中心经验
Int Angiol. 2017 Aug;36(4):306-315. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.16.03737-8. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
4
Results of carotid angioplasty and stenting are equivalent for critical versus high-grade lesions in patients deemed high risk for carotid endarterectomy.在被认为颈动脉内膜切除术高危的患者中,对于临界病变与重度狭窄病变,颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的结果相当。
J Surg Res. 2013 Nov;185(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.027. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
5
Unprotected carotid artery stenting in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis: results and long-term follow-up in a single-center experience.症状性重度狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术:单中心经验的结果和长期随访。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Aug;33(7):1285-91. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2951. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
6
Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial.症状性重度颈动脉狭窄患者内膜切除术与血管成形术对比研究(EVA-3S)试验:一项随机多中心试验的4年随访结果
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):885-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70195-9. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
7
Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting in Octogenarians in a Monocentric Experience.八十岁老人行颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术的单中心经验
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 May;33:132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.10.039. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
8
Anatomical and technical factors associated with stroke or death during carotid angioplasty and stenting: results from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial and systematic review.与颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术期间发生中风或死亡相关的解剖学和技术因素:症状性严重颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术与血管成形术(EVA-3S)试验和系统评价的结果。
Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):380-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588772. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
9
Technical improvements in carotid revascularization based on the mechanism of procedural stroke.基于手术性卒中机制的颈动脉血运重建技术改进。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019 Jun;60(3):313-324. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10918-4. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
10
Carotid Artery Stenting With Proximal Embolic Protection via a Transradial or Transbrachial Approach: Pushing the Boundaries of the Technique While Maintaining Safety and Efficacy.经桡动脉或肱动脉途径行近端栓子保护的颈动脉支架置入术:在保持安全性和有效性的同时拓展技术边界
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Aug;23(4):549-60. doi: 10.1177/1526602816651424. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉疾病支架置入术后选择性扩张与标准扩张的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 May;38(5):999-1005. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5103. Epub 2017 Mar 16.