Suppr超能文献

回顾潜在器官捐献者时,起点定义不精确会引起混淆:呼吁采用像“即将发生的脑死亡”这样可重现的方法。

Imprecise definitions of starting points in retrospectively reviewing potential organ donors causes confusion: call for a reproducible method like 'imminent brain death'.

机构信息

Dutch Transplant Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Transpl Int. 2012 Aug;25(8):830-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01505.x. Epub 2012 May 30.

Abstract

Low donor supply and the high demand for transplantable organs is an international problem. The efficiency of organ procurement is often expressed by donor conversion rates (DCRs). These rates differ among countries, but a uniform starting point for defining a potential heart-beating donor is lacking. Imprecise definitions cause confusion; therefore, we call for a reproducible method like imminent brain death (IBD), which contains criteria in detail to determine potential heart-beating donors. Medical charts of 4814 patients who died on an ICU in Dutch university hospitals between January 2007 and December 2009 were reviewed for potential heart-beating donors. We compared two starting points: 'Severe Brain Damage' (SBD) (old definition) and IBD (new definition), which differ in the number of absent brainstem reflexes. Of the potential donors defined by IBD 45.6% fulfilled the formal brain death criteria, compared with 33.6% in the larger SBD group. This results in a higher DCR in the IBD group (40% vs. 29.5%). We illustrated important differences in DCRs when using two different definitions, even within one country. To allow comparison among countries and hospitals, one universal definition of a potential heart-beating donor should be used. Therefore, we propose the use of IBD.

摘要

供体短缺与器官移植需求高是一个国际性问题。器官获取的效率通常用供体转化率(DCR)来表示。这些比率在各国之间存在差异,但缺乏统一的潜在心跳供体定义起点。不精确的定义会造成混淆;因此,我们呼吁采用一种可复制的方法,如即将发生的脑死亡(IBD),其中详细包含了确定潜在心跳供体的标准。我们回顾了 2007 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月期间荷兰大学医院 ICU 死亡的 4814 名患者的医疗记录,以寻找潜在的心跳供体。我们比较了两种起点:“严重脑损伤”(SBD)(旧定义)和 IBD(新定义),它们在缺乏脑干反射的数量上有所不同。根据 IBD 定义的潜在供体中,45.6%符合正式的脑死亡标准,而在更大的 SBD 组中,这一比例为 33.6%。这导致 IBD 组的 DCR 更高(40%比 29.5%)。我们展示了当使用两种不同的定义时,即使在一个国家内,DCR 也存在重要差异。为了能够在国家和医院之间进行比较,应该使用一个统一的潜在心跳供体定义。因此,我们建议使用 IBD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验