Suppr超能文献

内插任务对直接和间接错误再认的影响:初始回忆、再认和猜测反讽效应的影响。

Interpolated task effects on direct and mediated false recognition: effects of initial recall, recognition, and the ironic effect of guessing.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov;38(6):1720-30. doi: 10.1037/a0028476. Epub 2012 May 28.

Abstract

In two experiments, participants studied two types of word lists. Direct lists were taken from the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm (e.g., water, bridge, run) and contained words directly related to a nonpresented critical item (CI; e.g., river, Roediger & McDermott, 1995). Mediated lists (e.g., faucet, London, jog) contained words related to the CI through a nonpresented mediator. After each study list, participants completed either a recall test, a recall test with a warning about the CI, arithmetic problems, or a recognition test, or they guessed the CI. On a final recognition test, both warning and guessing decreased direct false recognition but increased mediated false recognition, an ironic effect of guessing. An initial recognition test also increased final mediated false recognition. We argue that warning and guessing tasks strengthened associative pathways to the CI, increased the accessibility of associated mediators, and increased monitoring for the CI at test. Increased monitoring was able to reduce CIs from direct, but not mediated, lists.

摘要

在两项实验中,参与者学习了两种类型的单词列表。直接列表取自 Deese-Roediger-McDermott(DRM)范式(例如,水、桥、跑),其中包含与非呈现关键项目(CI)直接相关的单词(例如,河流,Roediger 和 McDermott,1995)。中介列表(例如,水龙头、伦敦、慢跑)通过非呈现的中介词与 CI 相关。在每个学习列表之后,参与者要么完成回忆测试、带有 CI 警告的回忆测试、算术问题或识别测试,要么猜测 CI。在最后的识别测试中,警告和猜测都会减少直接错误识别,但会增加中介错误识别,这是猜测的讽刺效果。初始识别测试也会增加最终的中介错误识别。我们认为,警告和猜测任务加强了与 CI 的联想路径,增加了相关中介词的可及性,并增加了测试时对 CI 的监控。增加监控能够减少直接列表中的 CI,但不能减少中介列表中的 CI。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验