Tringali Alexa E, Huff Mark J
School of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, United States.
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 7;16:1529070. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1529070. eCollection 2025.
Studying lists of associatively related words often produces false recognition of non-studied critical lures (CL). This false memory illusion can be found both when word lists are directly related to a CL as in the DRM paradigm (e.g., water, bridge, run, for the CL ), and when words are indirectly related to CLs via non-presented mediators (e.g., faucet[water], London[bridge], jog[run], for the CL ). Mediated false memory is strong evidence for activation-monitoring processes over gist extraction as mediated lists lack a consistent gist theme. In the present study, we evaluated whether context details (font color) of studied lists are attributed to CLs when they are falsely recognized. Participants studied directly related and mediated word lists presented in one of two font colors, followed by a source test which required specification of the font color for recognized test items. When CLs were falsely recognized, participants were able to correctly identify the font color of the CL's origin list for both list types at a higher rate than incorrect identification. Because mediated false recognition reflects implicit activation, this pattern indicates activation processes may include both semantic and perceptual source details.
研究关联性相关单词列表常常会导致对未学习过的关键诱饵(CL)产生错误识别。当单词列表与关键诱饵直接相关时,如在DRM范式中(例如,对于关键诱饵“water”,有“water”、“bridge”、“run”),以及当单词通过未呈现的中介与关键诱饵间接相关时(例如,对于关键诱饵“water”,有“faucet[water]”、“London[bridge]”、“jog[run]”),都会出现这种错误记忆错觉。由于中介性错误记忆缺乏一致的主旨主题,所以它是激活监测过程优于主旨提取的有力证据。在本研究中,我们评估了在错误识别关键诱饵时,学习列表的上下文细节(字体颜色)是否会被归因于关键诱饵。参与者学习以两种字体颜色之一呈现的直接相关和中介性单词列表,随后进行源测试,该测试要求指明识别出的测试项目的字体颜色。当关键诱饵被错误识别时,对于两种列表类型,参与者都能以高于错误识别的正确率识别出关键诱饵原始列表的字体颜色。因为中介性错误识别反映了内隐激活,这种模式表明激活过程可能包括语义和感知源细节。