• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据护士临床判断的跌倒预测:内科、外科和老年病房之间的差异。

Fall prediction according to nurses' clinical judgment: differences between medical, surgical, and geriatric wards.

机构信息

Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jun;60(6):1115-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03957.x. Epub 2012 May 29.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03957.x
PMID:22642658
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the value of nurses' clinical judgment (NCJ) in predicting hospital inpatient falls.

DESIGN

Prospective multicenter study.

SETTING

Six Belgian hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Two thousand four hundred seventy participants (mean age 67.6 ± 18.3; female, 55.7%) on four surgical (n = 812, 32.9%), eight geriatric (n = 666, 27.0%), and four general medical wards (n = 992, 40.1%) were included upon admission. All participants were hospitalized for at least 48 hours.

MEASUREMENTS

Within 24 hours after admission, nurses gave their judgment on the question "Do you think your patient is at high risk for falling?" Nurses were not trained in assessing fall risk. Falls were documented on a standardized incident report form.

RESULTS

During hospitalization, 143 (5.8%) participants experienced one or more falls, accounting for 202 falls and corresponding to an overall rate of 7.9 falls per 1,000 patient days. NCJ of participant's risk of falling had high sensitivity (78-92%) with high negative predictive value (94-100%) but low positive predictive value (4-17%). Although false-negative rates were low (8-22%) for all departments and age groups, false-positive rates were high (55-74%), except on surgical and general medical wards and in participants younger than 75.

CONCLUSION

This analysis, based on multicenter data and a large sample size, suggests that NCJ can be recommended on surgical and general medical wards and in individuals younger than 75, but on geriatric wards and in participants aged 75 and older, NCJ overestimates risk of falling and is thus not recommended because expensive comprehensive fall-prevention measures would be implemented in a large number of individuals who do not need it.

摘要

目的

评估护士临床判断(NCJ)在预测医院住院患者跌倒中的价值。

设计

前瞻性多中心研究。

设置

比利时六家医院。

参与者

共纳入 2477 名参与者(平均年龄 67.6±18.3 岁;女性占 55.7%),分别在 4 个外科病房(n=812,32.9%)、8 个老年病房(n=666,27.0%)和 4 个普通内科病房(n=992,40.1%)接受入院评估。所有参与者的住院时间均至少为 48 小时。

测量方法

在入院后 24 小时内,护士对“您认为您的患者有跌倒高风险吗?”这一问题进行判断。护士未接受过评估跌倒风险的培训。使用标准化事件报告表记录跌倒情况。

结果

住院期间,共有 143 名(5.8%)参与者发生 1 次或多次跌倒,共发生 202 次跌倒,总跌倒发生率为每 1000 患者天 7.9 次。NCJ 对参与者跌倒风险的判断具有较高的敏感性(78%-92%)和较高的阴性预测值(94%-100%),但阳性预测值较低(4%-17%)。尽管所有科室和年龄组的假阴性率均较低(8%-22%),但假阳性率较高(55%-74%),除了外科和普通内科病房以及 75 岁以下的参与者。

结论

基于多中心数据和大样本量的分析表明,NCJ 可在外科和普通内科病房以及 75 岁以下的参与者中推荐使用,但在老年病房以及 75 岁及以上的参与者中,NCJ 高估了跌倒风险,因此不建议使用,因为需要实施昂贵的全面跌倒预防措施的人数众多,但这些人中许多人并不需要。

相似文献

1
Fall prediction according to nurses' clinical judgment: differences between medical, surgical, and geriatric wards.根据护士临床判断的跌倒预测:内科、外科和老年病房之间的差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jun;60(6):1115-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03957.x. Epub 2012 May 29.
2
Fall prediction in inpatients by bedside nurses using the St. Thomas's Risk Assessment Tool in Falling Elderly Inpatients (STRATIFY) instrument: a multicenter study.床边护士使用圣托马斯老年住院患者跌倒风险评估工具(STRATIFY)对住院患者进行跌倒预测:一项多中心研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 May;55(5):725-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01151.x.
3
The FIM instrument to identify patients at risk of falling in geriatric wards: a 10-year retrospective study.FIM 工具在老年病房识别易跌倒患者中的应用:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
Age Ageing. 2010 May;39(3):326-31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq010. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
4
The STRATIFY tool and clinical judgment were poor predictors of falling in an acute hospital setting.STRATIFY 工具和临床判断对急性医院环境中的跌倒预测效果不佳。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;63(1):109-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
5
Translating fall incidence data into fall-preventive measures in geriatric wards--a survey in Belgian hospitals.将老年病房的跌倒发生率数据转化为跌倒预防措施——比利时医院的一项调查
Gerontology. 2009;55(4):398-404. doi: 10.1159/000224936. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
6
Characteristics of hospital inpatient falls across clinical departments.各临床科室医院住院患者跌倒的特征。
Gerontology. 2008;54(6):342-8. doi: 10.1159/000129954. Epub 2008 May 6.
7
Accidental falls in hospital inpatients: evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of two risk assessment tools.住院患者在医院内意外跌倒:两种风险评估工具的敏感性和特异性评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Mar;66(3):690-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05231.x.
8
Incidence of in-hospital falls in geriatric patients before and after the introduction of an interdisciplinary team-based fall-prevention intervention.引入基于跨学科团队的跌倒预防干预措施前后老年患者院内跌倒的发生率
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Dec;55(12):2068-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01424.x. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
9
Frequencies of falls in Swiss hospitals: concordance between nurses' estimates and fall incident reports.瑞士医院跌倒频率:护士估计与跌倒事件报告的一致性。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Feb;46(2):164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
10
Falls in German in-patients and residents over 65 years of age.德国65岁及以上住院患者和居民的跌倒情况。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Mar;16(3):495-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01578.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of falls and fall-related injuries and their predictive factors in frail older persons with cancer: a multicenter study.虚弱的老年癌症患者跌倒及跌倒相关伤害的发生率及其预测因素:一项多中心研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):877. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03574-7.
2
Hospital Inpatient Falls across Clinical Departments.医院各临床科室住院患者跌倒情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 2;18(15):8167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158167.
3
Development and testing of the Geriatric Care Assessment Practices (G-CAP) survey.老年护理评估实践(G-CAP)调查的制定和测试。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 1;21(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02073-5.
4
Geriatric CO-mAnagement for Cardiology patients in the Hospital (G-COACH): study protocol of a prospective before-after effectiveness-implementation study.医院老年心脏病患者的共同管理(G-COACH):一项前瞻性前后对比有效性实施研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 21;8(10):e023593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023593.
5
Falls Risk Prediction for Older Inpatients in Acute Care Medical Wards: Is There an Interest to Combine an Early Nurse Assessment and the Artificial Neural Network Analysis?急性医疗病房中老年住院患者跌倒风险预测:早期护士评估与人工神经网络分析相结合是否有意义?
J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(1):131-137. doi: 10.1007/s12603-017-0950-z.
6
Pro-Active Fall-Risk Management is Mandatory to Sustain in Hospital-Fall Prevention in Older Patients--Validation of the LUCAS Fall-Risk Screening in 2,337 Patients.积极主动的跌倒风险管理对于维持老年患者在院防跌倒至关重要——2337 例患者中 LUCAS 跌倒风险筛查的验证。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2015 Dec;19(10):1012-8. doi: 10.1007/s12603-015-0662-1.
7
Fall predictors in older cancer patients: a multicenter prospective study.老年癌症患者跌倒的预测因素:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Dec 15;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-135.
8
Internal consistency and construct validity assessment of a revised Facts on Aging Quiz for Flemish nursing students: an exploratory study.针对佛兰芒护理专业学生的修订版衰老知识测验的内部一致性和结构效度评估:一项探索性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Dec 3;14:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-128.
9
In-hospital fall-risk screening in 4,735 geriatric patients from the LUCAS project.在 LUCAS 项目中对 4735 名老年患者进行院内跌倒风险筛查。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2013 Mar;17(3):264-9. doi: 10.1007/s12603-012-0390-8.