• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院老年心脏病患者的共同管理(G-COACH):一项前瞻性前后对比有效性实施研究的研究方案

Geriatric CO-mAnagement for Cardiology patients in the Hospital (G-COACH): study protocol of a prospective before-after effectiveness-implementation study.

作者信息

Deschodt Mieke, Van Grootven Bastiaan, Jeuris Anthony, Devriendt Els, Dierckx de Casterlé Bernadette, Dubois Christophe, Fagard Katleen, Herregods Marie-Christine, Hornikx Miek, Meuris Bart, Rex Steffen, Tournoy Jos, Milisen Koen, Flamaing Johan

机构信息

Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 21;8(10):e023593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023593.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023593
PMID:30344179
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6196878/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although the majority of older patients admitted to a cardiology unit present with at least one geriatric syndrome, guidelines on managing heart disease often do not consider the complex needs of frail older patients. Geriatric co-management has demonstrated potential to improve functional status, and reduce complications and length of stay, but evidence on the effectiveness in cardiology patients is lacking. This study aims to determine if geriatric co-management is superior to usual care in preventing functional decline, complications, mortality, readmission rates, reducing length of stay and improving quality of life in older patients admitted for acute heart disease or for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, and to identify determinants of success for geriatric co-management in this population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This prospective quasi-experimental before-and-after study will be performed on two cardiology units of the University Hospitals Leuven in Belgium in patients aged ≥75 years. In the precohort (n=227), usual care will be documented. A multitude of implementation strategies will be applied to allow for successful implementation of the model. Patients in the after cohort (n=227) will undergo a comprehensive geriatric assessment within 24 hours of admission to stratify them into one of three groups based on their baseline risk for developing functional decline: low-risk patients receive proactive consultation, high-risk patients will be co-managed by the geriatric nurse to prevent complications and patients with acute geriatric problems will receive an additional medication review and co-management by the geriatrician.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee UZ Leuven/KU Leuven (S58296). Written voluntary (proxy-)informed consent will be obtained from all participants at the start of the study. Dissemination of results will be through articles in scientific and professional journals both in English and Dutch and by conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02890927.

摘要

引言

尽管大多数入住心脏病科的老年患者至少患有一种老年综合征,但心脏病管理指南往往未考虑体弱老年患者的复杂需求。老年共同管理已显示出改善功能状态、减少并发症和缩短住院时间的潜力,但缺乏关于其对心脏病患者有效性的证据。本研究旨在确定老年共同管理在预防急性心脏病或经导管主动脉瓣植入术老年患者功能衰退、并发症、死亡率、再入院率、缩短住院时间和改善生活质量方面是否优于常规护理,并确定该人群中老年共同管理成功的决定因素。

方法与分析

这项前瞻性准实验前后对照研究将在比利时鲁汶大学医院的两个心脏病科对年龄≥75岁的患者进行。在前队列(n = 227)中,将记录常规护理情况。将应用多种实施策略以成功实施该模式。后队列(n = 227)中的患者将在入院后24小时内接受全面的老年评估,根据其发生功能衰退的基线风险分为三组之一:低风险患者接受主动咨询,高风险患者将由老年护士共同管理以预防并发症,患有急性老年问题的患者将接受额外的药物审查并由老年科医生共同管理。

伦理与传播

该研究方案已获得鲁汶大学医院/鲁汶大学医学伦理委员会(S58296)的批准。将在研究开始时从所有参与者处获得书面自愿(代理)知情同意书。研究结果将通过发表在英文和荷兰文的科学和专业期刊上的文章以及会议报告进行传播。

试验注册号

NCT02890927。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2661/6196878/a97143aa22ce/bmjopen-2018-023593f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2661/6196878/5540de9ff5ee/bmjopen-2018-023593f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2661/6196878/a97143aa22ce/bmjopen-2018-023593f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2661/6196878/5540de9ff5ee/bmjopen-2018-023593f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2661/6196878/a97143aa22ce/bmjopen-2018-023593f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Geriatric CO-mAnagement for Cardiology patients in the Hospital (G-COACH): study protocol of a prospective before-after effectiveness-implementation study.医院老年心脏病患者的共同管理(G-COACH):一项前瞻性前后对比有效性实施研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 21;8(10):e023593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023593.
2
Geriatric co-management for cardiology patients in the hospital: A quasi-experimental study.老年共病管理在医院心内科患者中的应用:一项准实验研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 May;69(5):1377-1387. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17093. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
3
[Multidimensional geriatric assessment before transcatheter aortic valve implantation in frail elderly patients with one-year follow-up. Cardio-geriatrician collaboration benefits?].[虚弱老年患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术前的多维老年评估及一年随访。心脏老年病科医生合作是否有益?]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2016 Sep;65(4):250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
4
Unplanned readmission prevention by a geriatric emergency network for transitional care (URGENT): a prospective before-after study.老年急诊网络进行过渡性护理以预防非计划性再入院(URGENT):一项前瞻性前后对照研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 7;19(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1233-9.
5
Is care based on comprehensive geriatric assessment with mobile teams better than usual care? A study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (The GerMoT study).由移动团队进行的基于综合老年评估的护理是否优于常规护理?一项随机对照试验的研究方案(老年移动团队研究)
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 10;8(10):e023969. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023969.
6
Effectiveness of in-hospital geriatric co-management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.院内老年共管理的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2017 Nov 1;46(6):903-910. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx051.
7
Implementation of a strategy involving a multidisciplinary mobile unit team to prevent hospital admission in nursing home residents: protocol of a quasi-experimental study (MMU-1 study).多学科移动单元团队实施策略以预防养老院居民住院:准实验研究方案(MMU-1 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):e034742. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034742.
8
The cardiac care bridge program: design of a randomized trial of nurse-coordinated transitional care in older hospitalized cardiac patients at high risk of readmission and mortality.心脏护理衔接项目:一项针对高再入院和死亡风险的老年住院心脏病患者的护士协调过渡性护理随机试验的设计
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3301-9.
9
Orthogeriatric co-management for older patients with a major osteoporotic fracture: Protocol of an observational pre-post study.老年骨质疏松性骨折患者的骨科老年共管理:一项观察性前后研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 5;18(4):e0283552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283552. eCollection 2023.
10
The Yale Geriatric Care Program: a model of care to prevent functional decline in hospitalized elderly patients.耶鲁老年护理项目:预防住院老年患者功能衰退的护理模式。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Dec;41(12):1345-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06486.x.

引用本文的文献

1
From research to daily clinical practice: implementation of orthogeriatric co-management in the trauma ward.从研究到日常临床实践:创伤病房中老年骨科联合管理的实施
Front Health Serv. 2023 Aug 30;3:1249832. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1249832. eCollection 2023.
2
Orthogeriatric co-management for older patients with a major osteoporotic fracture: Protocol of an observational pre-post study.老年骨质疏松性骨折患者的骨科老年共管理:一项观察性前后研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 5;18(4):e0283552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283552. eCollection 2023.
3
How to implement geriatric co-management in your hospital? Insights from the G-COACH feasibility study.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality indicators for in-hospital geriatric co-management programmes: a systematic literature review and international Delphi study.医院老年病共同管理项目的质量指标:系统文献综述与国际德尔菲研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 16;8(3):e020617. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020617.
2
Hospitalization-associated disability in older adults with valvular heart disease: incidence, risk factors and its association with care processes.老年瓣膜性心脏病患者住院相关残疾:发病率、危险因素及其与护理过程的关联
Acta Cardiol. 2018 Jan 4;73(6):566-572. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1421300.
3
Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital.
如何在医院实施老年共管理?来自 G-COACH 可行性研究的见解。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 2;22(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03051-1.
4
Importance of Geriatric Syndrome Screening within 48 Hours of Hospitalization for Identifying Readmission Risk: A Retrospective Study in an Acute-Care Hospital.住院48小时内进行老年综合征筛查对识别再入院风险的重要性:一项在急性护理医院的回顾性研究。
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020 Jun;24(2):83-90. doi: 10.4235/agmr.20.0017. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
对入院老年人进行综合老年评估。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD006211. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006211.pub3.
4
Effectiveness of in-hospital geriatric co-management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.院内老年共管理的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2017 Nov 1;46(6):903-910. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx051.
5
Postal screening can identify frailty and predict poor outcomes in older adults: longitudinal data from INTER-FRAIL study.邮政筛查可识别老年人的衰弱状况并预测不良结局:来自INTER-FRAIL研究的纵向数据
Age Ageing. 2016 Jul;45(4):469-74. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw048. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
6
A Call for Collaboration: Improving Cardiogeriatric Care.呼吁合作:改善老年心血管病学护理。
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Sep;32(9):1041-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.025. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
7
Who benefits from orthogeriatric treatment? Results from the Trondheim hip-fracture trial.谁能从骨科老年病治疗中获益?特隆赫姆髋部骨折试验的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Feb 19;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0218-1.
8
A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach.行为改变方法的分类:一种干预映射方法。
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;10(3):297-312. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
9
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
10
Simple solutions may not work for complex patients: A need for new paradigms in geriatric hospital medicine.简单的解决方案可能不适用于复杂的患者:老年医院医学需要新的范式。
J Hosp Med. 2015 May;10(5):343-4. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2327. Epub 2015 Feb 2.