Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, 2250 Alcazar Street, CSC 240, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Dec;26(4):838-49. doi: 10.1037/a0028449. Epub 2012 May 28.
Research exploring psychological dysfunction as a predictor of smoking cessation success may be limited by nonoptimal predictor variables (i.e., categorical psychodiagnostic measures vs. continuous personality-based manifestations of dysfunction) and imprecise outcomes (i.e., summative point-prevalence abstinence vs. constituent cessation milestone measures). Accordingly, this study evaluated the unique and overlapping relations of broad-spectrum personality traits (positive emotionality, negative emotionality, and constraint) and past-year psychopathology (anxiety, mood, and substance use disorder) to point-prevalence abstinence and three smoking cessation milestones: (a) initiating abstinence, (b) first lapse, and (c) transition from lapse to relapse. Participants were daily smokers (N = 1365) enrolled in a smoking cessation treatment study. In single-predictor regression models, each manifestation of internalizing dysfunction (lower positive emotionality, higher negative emotionality, and anxiety and mood disorder) predicted failure at one or more cessation milestone(s). In simultaneous predictor models, lower positive and higher negative emotionality significantly predicted failure to achieve milestones after controlling for psychopathology. Psychopathology did not predict any outcome when controlling for personality. Negative emotionality showed the most robust and consistent effects, significantly predicting failure to initiate abstinence, earlier lapse, and lower point-prevalence abstinence rates. Substance use disorder and constraint did not predict cessation outcomes, and no single variable predicted lapse-to-relapse transition. These findings suggest that personality-related manifestations of internalizing dysfunction are more accurate markers of affective sources of relapse risk than mood and anxiety disorders. Further, individuals with high trait-negative emotionality may require intensive intervention to promote the initiation and early maintenance of abstinence.
研究探索心理功能障碍作为戒烟成功的预测因素可能受到非最优预测变量(即分类心理诊断测量与功能障碍的连续基于人格的表现)和不精确结果(即总结性时点戒烟与组成性戒烟里程碑测量)的限制。因此,本研究评估了广谱人格特质(积极情绪、消极情绪和约束)和过去一年的精神病理学(焦虑、情绪和物质使用障碍)与时点戒烟和三个戒烟里程碑之间的独特和重叠关系:(a) 开始戒烟,(b) 首次复发,和 (c) 从复发到复发的转变。参与者为参加戒烟治疗研究的每日吸烟者(N=1365)。在单预测因子回归模型中,每种内化功能障碍的表现(较低的积极情绪、较高的消极情绪、焦虑和情绪障碍)都预测了一个或多个戒烟里程碑的失败。在同时预测模型中,在控制精神病理学后,较低的积极情绪和较高的消极情绪显著预测了无法达到里程碑。在控制人格时,精神病理学并不预测任何结果。消极情绪表现出最强大和一致的影响,显著预测了无法开始戒烟、更早复发和较低的时点戒烟率。物质使用障碍和约束不能预测戒烟结果,也没有单一变量可以预测复发到复发的转变。这些发现表明,内化功能障碍的与人格相关的表现是复发风险情感来源的更准确的标记,而不是情绪和焦虑障碍。此外,具有高特质消极情绪的个体可能需要强化干预来促进戒烟的开始和早期维持。