Cooney Derek R, Cooney Norma L, Wallus Harry, Wojcik Susan
Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 550 East Genesee / EMSTAT Center, Syracuse, NY, 13202, USA.
Int J Emerg Med. 2012 May 29;5(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-5-24.
This study was designed to evaluate emergency physician success and satisfaction using a video-assisted semi-rigid fiberoptic stylet, the Clarus Video System (CVS), during a simulated difficult airway scenario.
Emergency physicians (EPs) of all levels were first shown a brief slide show and three example videos, and then given 20 min to practice intubating a mannequin using both the CVS and standard direct laryngoscopy (DL). The mannequin was then placed in a c-collar and set to simulate an apneic patient with an edematous tongue and trismus. Each EP was given up to three timed attempts with each technique. They rated their satisfaction with the CVS, usefulness for their practice, and the effectiveness of the tutorial. Direct laryngoscopy had a 65% success rate on the first attempt, 20% on the second, and 15% required three or more. The CVS had a 100% success rate with a single attempt. Average time for independent DL attempts was 43.41 s (SD = ±26.82) and 38.71 s (SD = ±34.14) with CVS. Cumulative attempt times were analyzed and compared (DL = 74.55 ± 68.40 s and CVS = 38.71 ± 34.14 s; p = 0.028). EPs rated their satisfaction with, and usefulness of, the CVS as ≥6 out of 10.
Emergency physicians were able to successfully intubate a simulated difficult airway model on the first attempt 100% of the time. Emergency physicians were satisfied with the CVS and felt that it would be useful in their practice.
本研究旨在评估在模拟困难气道场景中,使用视频辅助半刚性光纤管芯(Clarus视频系统,CVS)时急诊医师的成功率和满意度。
首先向各级急诊医师展示了一个简短的幻灯片演示和三个示例视频,然后给予他们20分钟时间,使用CVS和标准直接喉镜检查(DL)对人体模型进行插管练习。随后将人体模型置于颈托中,设置为模拟一名伴有舌水肿和牙关紧闭的呼吸暂停患者。每位急诊医师对每种技术最多进行三次定时尝试。他们对CVS的满意度、对其临床实践的有用性以及教程的有效性进行了评分。直接喉镜检查首次尝试成功率为65%,第二次为20%,15%的情况需要三次或更多次尝试。CVS单次尝试成功率为100%。独立进行DL尝试的平均时间为43.41秒(标准差=±26.82),使用CVS时为38.71秒(标准差=±34.14)。对累计尝试时间进行了分析和比较(DL=74.55±68.40秒,CVS=38.71±34.14秒;p=0.028)。急诊医师对CVS的满意度和有用性评分均≥6分(满分10分)。
急诊医师在首次尝试时就能100%成功地对模拟困难气道模型进行插管。急诊医师对CVS感到满意,并认为它在临床实践中会很有用。