Suppr超能文献

超高相对分子质量聚乙烯经高度交联及退火处理后的耐磨性能在全髋关节置换陶瓷头中的表现。

Wear resistant performance of highly cross-linked and annealed ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene against ceramic heads in total hip arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2012 Dec;30(12):2031-7. doi: 10.1002/jor.22148. Epub 2012 May 29.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of ceramic femoral head material, size, and implantation periods on the wear of annealed, cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) (XLPE) in total hip arthroplasty compared to non-cross-linked conventional UHMWPE (CPE). XLPE was fabricated by cross-linking with 60 kGy irradiation and annealing. Femoral heads made from zirconia and alumina ceramics and cobalt-chrome (CoCr) of 22 or 26 mm diameter were used. In this retrospective cohort study, the femoral head penetration into the cup was measured digitally on radiographs of 367 hips with XLPE and 64 hips with CPE. The average follow-up periods were 6.3 and 11.9 years, respectively. Both XLPE creep and wear rates were significantly lower than those of CPE (0.19 mm vs. 0.44 mm, 0.0001 mm/year vs. 0.09 mm/year, respectively). Zirconia displayed increased wear rates compared to alumina in CPE; however, there was no difference among head materials in XLPE (0.0008, 0.00007, and -0.009 mm/year for zirconia, alumina, and CoCr, respectively). Neither head size or implantation period impacted XLPE wear. In contrast to CPE, XLPE displayed low wear rates surpassing the effects of varying femoral head material, size, implantation period, and patient demographics. Further follow-up is required to determine the long-term clinical performance of the annealed XLPE.

摘要

本研究旨在比较陶瓷股骨头材料、尺寸和植入时间对全髋关节置换中退火交联超高分子量聚乙烯(XLPE)与非交联传统超高分子量聚乙烯(CPE)磨损的影响。XLPE 通过 60kGy 辐照交联和退火制成。使用氧化锆和氧化铝陶瓷以及直径为 22 或 26mm 的钴铬(CoCr)股骨头。在这项回顾性队列研究中,通过对 367 髋使用 XLPE 和 64 髋使用 CPE 的 X 光片数字化测量股骨头对杯的穿透深度。平均随访时间分别为 6.3 年和 11.9 年。XLPE 的蠕变和磨损率均明显低于 CPE(0.19mm 对 0.44mm,0.0001mm/年对 0.09mm/年)。与 CPE 中的氧化铝相比,氧化锆显示出更高的磨损率;然而,在 XLPE 中,股骨头材料之间没有差异(氧化锆、氧化铝和 CoCr 的磨损率分别为 0.0008、0.00007 和-0.009mm/年)。股骨头尺寸和植入时间均未影响 XLPE 的磨损。与 CPE 相比,XLPE 显示出较低的磨损率,超过了股骨头材料、尺寸、植入时间和患者人口统计学因素的影响。需要进一步随访以确定退火 XLPE 的长期临床性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验