• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超高相对分子质量聚乙烯经高度交联及退火处理后的耐磨性能在全髋关节置换陶瓷头中的表现。

Wear resistant performance of highly cross-linked and annealed ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene against ceramic heads in total hip arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2012 Dec;30(12):2031-7. doi: 10.1002/jor.22148. Epub 2012 May 29.

DOI:10.1002/jor.22148
PMID:22644564
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of ceramic femoral head material, size, and implantation periods on the wear of annealed, cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) (XLPE) in total hip arthroplasty compared to non-cross-linked conventional UHMWPE (CPE). XLPE was fabricated by cross-linking with 60 kGy irradiation and annealing. Femoral heads made from zirconia and alumina ceramics and cobalt-chrome (CoCr) of 22 or 26 mm diameter were used. In this retrospective cohort study, the femoral head penetration into the cup was measured digitally on radiographs of 367 hips with XLPE and 64 hips with CPE. The average follow-up periods were 6.3 and 11.9 years, respectively. Both XLPE creep and wear rates were significantly lower than those of CPE (0.19 mm vs. 0.44 mm, 0.0001 mm/year vs. 0.09 mm/year, respectively). Zirconia displayed increased wear rates compared to alumina in CPE; however, there was no difference among head materials in XLPE (0.0008, 0.00007, and -0.009 mm/year for zirconia, alumina, and CoCr, respectively). Neither head size or implantation period impacted XLPE wear. In contrast to CPE, XLPE displayed low wear rates surpassing the effects of varying femoral head material, size, implantation period, and patient demographics. Further follow-up is required to determine the long-term clinical performance of the annealed XLPE.

摘要

本研究旨在比较陶瓷股骨头材料、尺寸和植入时间对全髋关节置换中退火交联超高分子量聚乙烯(XLPE)与非交联传统超高分子量聚乙烯(CPE)磨损的影响。XLPE 通过 60kGy 辐照交联和退火制成。使用氧化锆和氧化铝陶瓷以及直径为 22 或 26mm 的钴铬(CoCr)股骨头。在这项回顾性队列研究中,通过对 367 髋使用 XLPE 和 64 髋使用 CPE 的 X 光片数字化测量股骨头对杯的穿透深度。平均随访时间分别为 6.3 年和 11.9 年。XLPE 的蠕变和磨损率均明显低于 CPE(0.19mm 对 0.44mm,0.0001mm/年对 0.09mm/年)。与 CPE 中的氧化铝相比,氧化锆显示出更高的磨损率;然而,在 XLPE 中,股骨头材料之间没有差异(氧化锆、氧化铝和 CoCr 的磨损率分别为 0.0008、0.00007 和-0.009mm/年)。股骨头尺寸和植入时间均未影响 XLPE 的磨损。与 CPE 相比,XLPE 显示出较低的磨损率,超过了股骨头材料、尺寸、植入时间和患者人口统计学因素的影响。需要进一步随访以确定退火 XLPE 的长期临床性能。

相似文献

1
Wear resistant performance of highly cross-linked and annealed ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene against ceramic heads in total hip arthroplasty.超高相对分子质量聚乙烯经高度交联及退火处理后的耐磨性能在全髋关节置换陶瓷头中的表现。
J Orthop Res. 2012 Dec;30(12):2031-7. doi: 10.1002/jor.22148. Epub 2012 May 29.
2
Oxidized zirconium head on crosslinked polyethylene liner in total hip arthroplasty: a 7- to 12-year in vivo comparative wear study.全髋关节置换术中氧化锆股骨头与交联聚乙烯内衬的体内比较磨损研究:7至12年随访
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3836-45. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4503-7.
3
Ten-year follow-up study of three alternative bearing surfaces used in total hip arthroplasty in young patients: a prospective randomised controlled trial.年轻患者全髋关节置换术中三种替代关节面的十年随访研究:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Dec;99-B(12):1590-1595. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2017-0353.R1.
4
A comparison of the wear and physical properties of silane cross-linked polyethylene and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene.硅烷交联聚乙烯与超高分子量聚乙烯的磨损及物理性能比较
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Dec;16(8):1018-23. doi: 10.1054/arth.2001.27234.
5
Early outcomes of sequentially cross-linked thin polyethylene liners with large diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中使用大直径股骨头的序贯交联薄聚乙烯内衬的早期疗效
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011;69 Suppl 1:S90-4.
6
Wear behaviour of cross-linked polyethylene assessed in vitro under severe conditions.在严苛条件下体外评估交联聚乙烯的磨损行为。
Biomaterials. 2005 Jun;26(16):3259-67. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.070.
7
Tribological and material analyses of retrieved alumina and zirconia ceramic heads correlated with polyethylene wear after total hip replacement.翻修全髋关节置换术后取出的氧化铝和氧化锆陶瓷股骨头的摩擦学及材料分析与聚乙烯磨损的相关性
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jun;90(6):731-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.20540.
8
Five-year comparison of wear using oxidised zirconium and cobalt-chrome femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.全髋关节置换术中氧化锆与钴铬合金股骨头磨损的五年比较:一项多中心随机对照试验
Bone Joint J. 2015 Jul;97-B(7):883-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B7.35285.
9
Otto Aufranc Award: Crosslinking Reduces THA Wear, Osteolysis, and Revision Rates at 15-year Followup Compared With Noncrosslinked Polyethylene.奥托·奥夫兰克奖:与非交联聚乙烯相比,交联聚乙烯在15年随访时可降低全髋关节置换术的磨损、骨溶解和翻修率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):279-290. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000036.
10
Wear and Osteolysis of Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene at 10 to 14 Years: The Effect of Femoral Head Size.10至14年时高交联聚乙烯的磨损与骨溶解:股骨头尺寸的影响
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):365-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4319-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Rate of revision and wear penetration in different polyethylene liner compositions in total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.不同聚乙烯衬垫材料在全髋关节置换术中的翻修率和磨损穿透率:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 10;14(1):21162. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71326-1.
2
Head, acetabular liner composition, and rate of revision and wear in total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.头、髋臼衬里成分以及全髋关节置换术的翻修率和磨损:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47670-z.
3
Risk factors for liner wear and head migration in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
髋关节置换术后髋臼内衬磨损和头迁移的危险因素:系统评价。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 20;13(1):15612. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42809-4.
4
Encouraging outcomes of stemless ceramic head anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in severe primary osteoarthritis (Walch type B glenoids).无柄陶瓷头解剖型肩关节置换术治疗重度原发性骨关节炎(Walch B型关节盂)的良好疗效
Shoulder Elbow. 2023 Feb;15(1):28-36. doi: 10.1177/17585732211048120. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
5
Wear Risk Prevention and Reduction in Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Personalized Study Comparing Cement and Cementless Fixation Techniques Employing Finite Element Analysis.全髋关节置换术中磨损风险的预防与降低。一项采用有限元分析比较骨水泥和非骨水泥固定技术的个性化研究。
J Pers Med. 2021 Aug 10;11(8):780. doi: 10.3390/jpm11080780.
6
Prospective Study Showing Results of Large-Diameter Femoral Heads After Cementless Total Hip Replacement.前瞻性研究显示非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术后大直径股骨头的效果。
Cureus. 2021 Jan 10;13(1):e12610. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12610.
7
Recent update on crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中交联聚乙烯的最新进展
SICOT J. 2020;6:13. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2020013. Epub 2020 May 15.
8
Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty: should everyone get one?双动全髋关节置换术:每个人都应该做这个手术吗?
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Sep 3;4(9):541-547. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180045. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Do component position and muscle strength affect the cup-head translation during gait after total hip arthroplasty?全髋关节置换术后步态期间,组件位置和肌肉力量是否会影响髋臼杯与股骨头之间的平移?
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Aug;29(6):1263-1269. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02443-1. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
10
Dynamic hip kinematics during squatting before and after total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术前、后深蹲时髋关节的动态运动学。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jul 3;13(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0873-3.