Department of Sociology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Dec;27(18):3579-600. doi: 10.1177/0886260512447579. Epub 2012 May 29.
In prior research, Ackerman and Field (2011) found that intimate partner violence (IPV) affects the relationship satisfaction of females more than the relationship satisfaction of males. The current research replicated those findings on a different sample of men and women. In addition to confirming past findings, it also found that gendered patterns in IPV differed substantially for current versus former relationships. Subsequent analyses indicated that gendered differences in whether relationships are continued or terminated after IPV apparently explained these patterns. The current analyses illustrate how relationship continuation differences across gender can produce sample selection biases that substantially affect conclusions about whether partner violence is perpetrated equally by men and women. More specifically, the results of this research are consistent with the conclusion that female IPV victims are more likely than are male victims to become dissatisfied with aggressive opposite-sex partnerships and subsequently terminate their aggressive relationships. For this reason, research that relies only upon the analysis of current relationships will underestimate the amount of partner violence committed by men.
在先前的研究中,阿克曼和菲尔德(2011 年)发现亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)对女性的关系满意度的影响大于对男性的关系满意度。本研究在不同的男性和女性样本上复制了这些发现。除了证实过去的发现外,它还发现,在当前和以前的关系中,IPV 的性别模式有很大的不同。随后的分析表明,在 IPV 之后关系是否继续或终止的性别差异显然解释了这些模式。目前的分析说明了性别差异如何在关系延续方面产生样本选择偏差,从而极大地影响了关于伴侣暴力是否平等地由男性和女性实施的结论。更具体地说,这项研究的结果与女性 IPV 受害者比男性受害者更有可能对攻击性异性关系感到不满,并随后终止他们的攻击性关系的结论一致。因此,仅依赖于当前关系分析的研究将低估男性实施的伴侣暴力的数量。