Kennedy Johanna, Brown Ted, Stagnitti Karen
Occupational Science and Therapy Program, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Medicine, Nursing, and Behavioural Sciences, Deakin University-Waterfront Campus, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2013 Jan;20(1):45-53. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2012.693944. Epub 2012 May 31.
BACKGROUND/ AIM: Therapists use different types of tests, scales, and instruments to assess children's motor skills, including those classified as being top-down and bottom-up. The aim of the study was to investigate the ability of measures of children's motor skill performance from the perspectives of children and parents (a type of top-down assessment) to predict children's performance-based motor ability test results (a type of bottom-up assessment).
A convenience sample of 38 children and parents was recruited from Victoria, Australia. Motor skill performance was evaluated from a top-down perspective using the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire (PSDQ) and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children--Second Edition (MABC-2) Checklist to measure children's and parents' perspectives respectively. Motor skill performance was also evaluated from a bottom-up approach using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency--Second Edition (BOT-2). Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis to determine whether the PSDQ or MABC-2 Checklist was predictive of the children's BOT-2 performance results.
Two predictive relationships were identified based on parents' perspectives, where the total score of the MABC-2 Checklist was found to be a significant predictor of the BOT-2 Manual Coordination motor composite score, accounting for 8.35% of its variance, and the BOT-2 Strength and Agility motor composite score, accounting for 11.6% of its variance. No predictive relationships were identified between the children's self-report PSDQ perspectives and the BOT-2 performance scores.
Therapists are encouraged to utilize a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches and purposefully to seek parents' and children's perspectives when evaluating children's motor skill performance.
背景/目的:治疗师使用不同类型的测试、量表和工具来评估儿童的运动技能,包括那些被归类为自上而下和自下而上的测试。本研究的目的是从儿童和家长的角度(一种自上而下的评估方式),调查儿童运动技能表现测量方法预测基于表现的儿童运动能力测试结果(一种自下而上的评估方式)的能力。
从澳大利亚维多利亚州招募了38名儿童及其家长作为便利样本。使用身体自我描述问卷(PSDQ)和儿童运动评估量表第二版(MABC - 2)清单分别从儿童和家长的角度,从自上而下的视角评估运动技能表现。还使用布鲁宁克斯 - 奥塞瑞斯基运动熟练度测试第二版(BOT - 2)从自下而上的方法评估运动技能表现。使用多元线性回归分析来分析数据,以确定PSDQ或MABC - 2清单是否能预测儿童的BOT - 2表现结果。
基于家长的视角确定了两种预测关系,其中发现MABC - 2清单的总分是BOT - 2手动协调运动综合得分的显著预测指标,占其方差的8.35%,也是BOT - 2力量和敏捷运动综合得分的显著预测指标,占其方差的11.6%。在儿童自我报告的PSDQ视角与BOT - 2表现得分之间未发现预测关系。
鼓励治疗师在评估儿童运动技能表现时,结合使用自上而下和自下而上的方法,并有意寻求家长和儿童的观点。