• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新开发的基于媒体支持的基础生命支持培训四步法的评估。

Evaluation of a newly developed media-supported 4-step approach for basic life support training.

作者信息

Sopka Saša, Biermann Henning, Rossaint Rolf, Knott Sebastian, Skorning Max, Brokmann Jörg C, Heussen Nicole, Beckers Stefan K

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 May 30;20:37. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-37.

DOI:10.1186/1757-7241-20-37
PMID:22647148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3461483/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The quality of external chest compressions (ECC) is of primary importance within basic life support (BLS). Recent guidelines delineate the so-called 4"-step approach" for teaching practical skills within resuscitation training guided by a certified instructor. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a "media-supported 4-step approach" for BLS training leads to equal practical performance compared to the standard 4-step approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After baseline testing, 220 laypersons were either trained using the widely accepted method for resuscitation training (4-step approach) or using a newly created "media-supported 4-step approach", both of equal duration. In this approach, steps 1 and 2 were ensured via a standardised self-produced podcast, which included all of the information regarding the BLS algorithm and resuscitation skills. Participants were tested on manikins in the same mock cardiac arrest single-rescuer scenario prior to intervention, after one week and after six months with respect to ECC-performance, and participants were surveyed about the approach.

RESULTS

Participants (age 23 ± 11, 69% female) reached comparable practical ECC performances in both groups, with no statistical difference. Even after six months, there was no difference detected in the quality of the initial assessment algorithm or delay concerning initiation of CPR. Overall, at least 99% of the intervention group (n = 99; mean 1.5 ± 0.8; 6-point Likert scale: 1 = completely agree, 6 = completely disagree) agreed that the video provided an adequate introduction to BLS skills.

CONCLUSIONS

The "media-supported 4-step approach" leads to comparable practical ECC-performance compared to standard teaching, even with respect to retention of skills. Therefore, this approach could be useful in special educational settings where, for example, instructors' resources are sparse or large-group sessions have to be prepared.

摘要

目的

在基础生命支持(BLS)中,胸外按压(ECC)的质量至关重要。最近的指南规定了在认证教员指导下的复苏培训中教授实践技能的所谓“4步方法”。本研究的目的是评估BLS培训的“媒体支持4步方法”与标准4步方法相比是否能带来同等的实践表现。

材料与方法

在基线测试后,220名外行人要么接受广泛接受的复苏培训方法(4步方法),要么接受新创建的“媒体支持4步方法”培训,两种方法持续时间相同。在这种方法中,步骤1和2通过标准化的自制播客来确保,该播客包含了所有关于BLS算法和复苏技能的信息。在干预前、干预后一周和六个月,让参与者在相同的模拟心脏骤停单人救援场景中使用人体模型进行ECC性能测试,并对参与者进行关于该方法的调查。

结果

两组参与者(年龄23±11岁,69%为女性)在实践ECC表现上相当,无统计学差异。即使在六个月后,初始评估算法的质量或开始心肺复苏的延迟方面也未检测到差异。总体而言,至少99%的干预组(n = 99;平均1.5±0.8;6点李克特量表:1 = 完全同意,6 = 完全不同意)同意该视频对BLS技能进行了充分介绍。

结论

与标准教学相比,“媒体支持4步方法”能带来相当的实践ECC表现,即使在技能保持方面也是如此。因此,这种方法在特殊教育环境中可能有用,例如在教员资源稀缺或必须准备大型团体课程的情况下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a756/3461483/07f5b720902f/1757-7241-20-37-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a756/3461483/4b743e00b998/1757-7241-20-37-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a756/3461483/f3a045e2b444/1757-7241-20-37-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a756/3461483/07f5b720902f/1757-7241-20-37-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a756/3461483/4b743e00b998/1757-7241-20-37-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a756/3461483/f3a045e2b444/1757-7241-20-37-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a756/3461483/07f5b720902f/1757-7241-20-37-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a newly developed media-supported 4-step approach for basic life support training.一种新开发的基于媒体支持的基础生命支持培训四步法的评估。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 May 30;20:37. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-37.
2
Comparison of a newly established emotional stimulus approach to a classical assessment-driven approach in BLS training: a randomised controlled trial.基础生命支持培训中一种新建立的情感刺激方法与传统评估驱动方法的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 22;8(2):e017705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017705.
3
Influence of learning styles on the practical performance after the four-step basic life support training approach - An observational cohort study.学习风格对四步基础生命支持培训方法后实践表现的影响——一项观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2017 May 22;12(5):e0178210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178210. eCollection 2017.
4
Resuscitation training in small-group setting--gender matters.小组环境下的复苏培训——性别因素
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 Apr 16;21:30. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-30.
5
Certified Basic Life Support Instructors Identify Improper Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Poorly: Instructor Assessments Versus Resuscitation Manikin Data.认证基础生命支持指导员对不当心肺复苏技能的识别能力较差:指导员评估与复苏人体模型数据的对比。
Simul Healthc. 2019 Oct;14(5):281-286. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000386.
6
Influence of pre-course assessment using an emotionally activating stimulus with feedback: a pilot study in teaching Basic Life Support.使用带反馈的情感激发刺激进行课前评估的影响:基础生命支持教学中的初步研究。
Resuscitation. 2012 Feb;83(2):219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.08.024. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
7
Assessment of BLS skills: optimizing use of instructor and manikin measures.基础生命支持技能评估:优化教员和人体模型测量方法的使用
Resuscitation. 2008 Feb;76(2):233-43. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.07.018. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
8
The effect of peer-group size on the delivery of feedback in basic life support refresher training: a cluster randomized controlled trial.同伴小组规模对基础生命支持复习培训中反馈传递的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 4;16:167. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0682-5.
9
Self-learning basic life support: A randomised controlled trial on learning conditions.自主学习基础生命支持:学习条件的随机对照试验。
Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.02.031. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
10
Peer education for BLS-training in schools? Results of a randomized-controlled, noninferiority trial.学校中基础生命支持培训的同伴教育?一项随机对照非劣效性试验的结果。
Resuscitation. 2015 Sep;94:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.06.026. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety management within the scope of teaching practical clinical skills: framing errors for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training - a multi-arm randomized controlled equivalence trial.临床实践技能教学范围内的安全管理:心肺复苏培训中的框架错误——一项多臂随机对照等效性试验
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2408458. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2408458. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
2
[Feasibility of clinical examination scenarios under pandemic conditions].[大流行条件下临床检查场景的可行性]
HNO. 2024 Mar;72(3):182-189. doi: 10.1007/s00106-024-01422-1. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
3
From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of ultrabrief and brief educational videos for training lay responders in hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: implications for the future of citizen cardiopulmonary resuscitation training.超短和简短教育视频用于培训非专业急救人员进行徒手心肺复苏的效果:对公民心肺复苏培训未来的启示
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Mar;4(2):220-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.959353. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
2
A randomized controlled trial comparing traditional training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to self-directed CPR learning in first year medical students: The two-person CPR study.一项比较传统心肺复苏术(CPR)培训与第一年医学生自主 CPR 学习的随机对照试验:双人 CPR 研究。
Resuscitation. 2011 Mar;82(3):319-25. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.10.025. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
3
从传统到创新:传统的四步教学法与混合学习改进在技术技能教学中的比较。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Nov 14;31(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01127-4.
4
2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces.2023 年国际心肺复苏和紧急心血管护理科学共识及治疗推荐:基础生命支持、高级生命支持、儿科生命支持、新生儿生命支持、教育、实施和团队以及急救任务组的总结。
Circulation. 2023 Dec 12;148(24):e187-e280. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001179. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
5
Stepwise approach to skills teaching in resuscitation: A systematic review.复苏技能教学的逐步方法:一项系统评价。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Aug 28;16:100457. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100457. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Innovative Tele-Instruction Approach Impacts Basic Life Support Performance: A Non-inferiority Trial.创新远程指导方法对基本生命支持性能的影响:一项非劣效性试验。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 12;9:825823. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.825823. eCollection 2022.
7
Blended learning for accredited life support courses - A systematic review.经认可的生命支持课程的混合式学习——一项系统综述。
Resusc Plus. 2022 May 10;10:100240. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100240. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Peer video feedback builds basic life support skills: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.同伴视频反馈可提高基本生命支持技能:一项随机对照非劣效试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254923. eCollection 2021.
9
Knowledge and perceptions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation amongst New Zealand podiatrists: a web-based survey.新西兰足病医生对心肺复苏术的知识和认知:一项基于网络的调查。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2021 May 14;14(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13047-021-00481-9.
10
The effectiveness of the Peyton's 4-step teaching approach on skill acquisition of procedures in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis with integrated meta-regression.佩顿四步教学法在健康职业教育中程序技能习得方面的有效性:一项整合元回归的系统评价与荟萃分析
PeerJ. 2020 Oct 9;8:e10129. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10129. eCollection 2020.
Emergency skill training--a randomized controlled study on the effectiveness of the 4-stage approach compared to traditional clinical teaching.紧急技能培训——4 阶段方法与传统临床教学效果的随机对照研究。
Resuscitation. 2010 Dec;81(12):1692-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.09.478. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
4
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators.《2010年欧洲复苏委员会复苏指南》第2节。成人基础生命支持和自动体外除颤器的使用。
Resuscitation. 2010 Oct;81(10):1277-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.009.
5
A randomised trial comparing a 4-stage to 2-stage teaching technique for laryngeal mask insertion.一项比较 4 阶段与 2 阶段教学技术用于喉罩插入的随机试验。
Resuscitation. 2010 Dec;81(12):1687-91. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.026. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
6
The effect of basic life support education on laypersons' willingness in performing bystander hands only cardiopulmonary resuscitation.基础生命支持教育对非专业人员行单纯徒手心肺复苏意愿的影响。
Resuscitation. 2010 Jun;81(6):691-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.02.021. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
7
The testing effect on skills learning might last 6 months.技能学习的测试效应可能持续 6 个月。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Aug;15(3):395-401. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9207-x. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
8
Effectiveness of simplified chest compression-only CPR training program with or without preparatory self-learning video: a randomized controlled trial.有无预备性自学视频的简化仅胸外按压心肺复苏培训项目的效果:一项随机对照试验
Resuscitation. 2009 Oct;80(10):1164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
9
The effect of testing on skills learning.测试对技能学习的影响。
Med Educ. 2009 Jan;43(1):21-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03245.x.
10
Public perception of and willingness to perform bystander CPR in Japan.日本公众对旁观者心肺复苏术(CPR)的认知及实施意愿。
Resuscitation. 2008 Dec;79(3):475-81. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Sep 20.