• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160 毫克对比缬沙坦 160 毫克治疗中国高血压患者的疗效。

Amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg versus valsartan 160 mg in Chinese hypertensives.

机构信息

Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):2024-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.039. Epub 2012 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.039
PMID:22647413
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A majority of hypertensives require treatment with ≥2 antihypertensive therapies to achieve blood pressure (BP) goals. Single-pill combinations (SPC) may improve convenience and adherence to therapy and reduce health care resource use and costs. The antihypertensive effects of amlodipine and valsartan are well established. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg SPC for the treatment of hypertension in predominantly Chinese patients not adequately controlled on valsartan 160 mg alone.

METHODS

In this multicentre study (24 centres), adults with stage 1 or 2 hypertension not adequately controlled with valsartan monotherapy were randomised to receive double-blind amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg SPC or valsartan 160 mg once daily for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

The least-square mean change (standard error) from baseline to endpoint in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP) at trough, the primary efficacy variable, was -10.3 (0.39) mm Hg with amlodipine/valsartan and -6.6 (0.40) mm Hg with valsartan (difference: -3.7 [0.54] mm Hg, p<0.0001). The corresponding results for mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) were -14.9 (0.61) mm Hg and -7.0 (0.61) mm Hg, respectively (difference: -7.9 [0.84] mm Hg, p<0.0001). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved overall BP control (MSSBP/MSDBP<140/90 mm Hg) with combination therapy (61.3%) versus monotherapy (39.3%; p<0.0001). Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg SPC is a safe and effective therapy for lowering BP in predominantly Chinese adults with stage 1 or 2 hypertension not adequately controlled with valsartan 160 mg monotherapy.

摘要

背景

大多数高血压患者需要使用≥2 种降压治疗药物才能达到血压(BP)目标。单片复方制剂(SPC)可能会提高治疗的便利性和依从性,减少医疗资源的使用和成本。氨氯地平和缬沙坦的降压作用已得到充分证实。本研究评估了氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg SPC 治疗主要为中国人的高血压患者的疗效和安全性,这些患者单独使用缬沙坦 160mg 治疗后血压仍未得到充分控制。

方法

在这项多中心研究(24 个中心)中,接受缬沙坦单药治疗但血压仍未得到充分控制的 1 期或 2 期高血压成年患者被随机分为接受双盲氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg SPC 或缬沙坦 160mg 每日一次治疗 8 周。

结果

从基线到终点时,最低平方均值变化(标准误差)在谷值时的平均坐位舒张压(MSDBP)是氨氯地平/缬沙坦组-10.3(0.39)mmHg,缬沙坦组-6.6(0.40)mmHg(差异:-3.7[0.54]mmHg,p<0.0001)。相应的平均坐位收缩压(MSSBP)结果分别为-14.9(0.61)mmHg 和-7.0(0.61)mmHg(差异:-7.9[0.84]mmHg,p<0.0001)。与单药治疗相比,联合治疗(61.3%)有更多的患者达到了总体血压控制(MSSBP/MSDBP<140/90mmHg)(差异:39.3%;p<0.0001)。两种治疗方法均具有良好的耐受性。

结论

氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg SPC 是一种安全有效的治疗方法,可降低主要为中国人的 1 期或 2 期高血压患者的血压,这些患者单独使用缬沙坦 160mg 治疗后血压仍未得到充分控制。

相似文献

1
Amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg versus valsartan 160 mg in Chinese hypertensives.氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160 毫克对比缬沙坦 160 毫克治疗中国高血压患者的疗效。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):2024-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.039. Epub 2012 May 28.
2
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.
3
[Efficacy and safety of the single pill combination of valsartan 80 mg plus amlodipine 5 mg in mild to moderate essential hypertensive patients without adequate blood pressure control by monotherapy].缬沙坦80毫克加氨氯地平5毫克单片复方制剂治疗单药治疗血压控制不佳的轻至中度原发性高血压患者的疗效和安全性
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2009 Sep;37(9):794-9.
4
Efficacy and safety of a single-pill combination of amlodipine/valsartan in Asian hypertensive patients inadequately controlled with amlodipine monotherapy.在使用氨氯地平单药治疗未能充分控制的亚洲高血压患者中,氨氯地平/缬沙坦单片复方制剂的疗效和安全性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jul;26(7):1705-13. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.487391.
5
Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.两项多中心、为期8周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,评估氨氯地平和缬沙坦联合用药及单药治疗对轻度至中度原发性高血压成年患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):563-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.03.018.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine/valsartan combination therapy in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled on amlodipine monotherapy.氨氯地平/缬沙坦联合治疗对氨氯地平单药治疗控制不佳的高血压患者的疗效和耐受性
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Nov;25(11):2655-62. doi: 10.1185/03007990903251193.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
8
Moderate versus intensive treatment of hypertension using amlodipine/valsartan and with the addition of hydrochlorothiazide for patients uncontrolled on angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy: results in racial/ethnic subgroups.氨氯地平/缬沙坦对高血压进行中度与强化治疗,并对血管紧张素受体阻滞剂单药治疗未达标的患者加用氢氯噻嗪:种族/族裔亚组的结果
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2011 Jul-Aug;5(4):249-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
9
Comparison of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy at doses up to 320/25 mg versus monotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study followed by long-term combination therapy in hypertensive adults.缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪剂量高达320/25毫克的联合治疗与单药治疗的比较:一项针对高血压成人的双盲、安慰剂对照研究,随后进行长期联合治疗。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.007.
10
Comparison of the efficacy and safety profiles of two fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensive agents, amlodipine/benazepril versus valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study.比较两种固定剂量复方降压药(氨氯地平/贝那普利与缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪)在 2 型糖尿病合并高血压患者中的疗效和安全性:一项为期 16 周、多中心、随机、双盲、非劣效性研究。
Clin Ther. 2012 Aug;34(8):1735-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of valsartan/amlodipine in hypertensive patients with stroke: China Status II subanalysis.缬沙坦/氨氯地平治疗卒中后高血压患者的有效性和安全性:中国现状II亚组分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(26):e7172. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007172.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily 160 mg valsartan in Chinese patients with mild to moderate hypertension.每日一次服用160毫克缬沙坦对中国轻至中度高血压患者的疗效及耐受性
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Mar;13(3):1109-1116. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4051. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
3
Formulations of Amlodipine: A Review.
氨氯地平制剂:综述
J Pharm (Cairo). 2016;2016:8961621. doi: 10.1155/2016/8961621. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
4
Valsartan 160 mg/Amlodipine 5 mg Combination Therapy versus Amlodipine 10 mg in Hypertensive Patients with Inadequate Response to Amlodipine 5 mg Monotherapy.缬沙坦160毫克/氨氯地平5毫克联合治疗与氨氯地平10毫克治疗对氨氯地平5毫克单药治疗反应不佳的高血压患者的疗效比较
Korean Circ J. 2016 Mar;46(2):222-8. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.2.222. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
5
Effectiveness of Valsartan/Amlodipine Single-pill Combination in Hypertensive Patients With Excess Body Weight: Subanalysis of China Status II.缬沙坦/氨氯地平单片复方制剂在超重高血压患者中的疗效:中国状态II亚分析
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2015 Nov;66(5):497-503. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000301.
6
Efficacy and safety of valsartan/amlodipine single-pill combination in 11,422 Chinese patients with hypertension: an observational study.缬沙坦/氨氯地平单片复方制剂治疗11422例中国高血压患者的疗效和安全性:一项观察性研究
Adv Ther. 2014 Jul;31(7):762-75. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0132-x. Epub 2014 Jul 2.