Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Australia.
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Sep;46(9):1146-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.04.022. Epub 2012 May 28.
Although traditionally obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and impulse control disorders (ICD) have represented opposing ends of a continuum, recent research has demonstrated a frequent co-occurrence of impulsive and compulsive behaviours, which may contribute to a worse clinical picture of some psychiatric disorders. We hypothesize that individuals with 'impulsive' OCD as characterized by poor insight, low resistance, and reduced control towards their compulsions will have a deteriorative course, greater severity of hoarding and/or symmetry/ordering symptoms, and comorbid ICD and/or substance use disorders (SUD). The sample consisted of 869 individuals with a minimum score of 16 on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Of these, 65 had poor insight, low resistance, and reduced control towards compulsions ('poor IRC') and 444 had preserved insight, greater resistance and better control over compulsions ('good IRC'). These two groups were compared on a number of clinical and demographic variables. Individuals with poor IRC were significantly more likely to have a deteriorative course (p < 0.001), longer duration of obsessions (p = 0.017), greater severity of symmetry/ordering (p < 0.001), contamination/cleaning (p < 0.001) and hoarding (p = 0.002) symptoms, and comorbid intermittent explosive disorder (p = 0.026), trichotillomania (p = 0.014) and compulsive buying (p = 0.040). Regression analysis revealed that duration of obsessions (p = 0.037) and hoarding severity (p = 0.005) were significant predictors of poor IRC. In the absence of specific measures for impulsivity in OCD, the study highlights the utility of simple measures such as insight, resistance and control over compulsions as a phenotypic marker of a subgroup of OCD with impulsive features demonstrating poor clinical outcome.
虽然传统上强迫症(OCD)和冲动控制障碍(ICD)代表了一个连续体的两个极端,但最近的研究表明冲动和强迫行为经常同时发生,这可能导致一些精神障碍的临床症状更严重。我们假设,具有“冲动”强迫症特征的个体,表现为洞察力差、抵抗力低、对强迫行为的控制能力降低,他们的病程会恶化,囤积症和/或对称/秩序症状的严重程度更高,并且会合并冲动控制障碍和/或物质使用障碍(SUD)。该样本由 869 名耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)得分至少为 16 分的个体组成。其中,65 名个体对强迫行为洞察力差、抵抗力低、控制能力降低(“不良 IRC”),444 名个体对强迫行为洞察力良好、抵抗力更强、控制能力更好(“良好 IRC”)。这两组在许多临床和人口统计学变量上进行了比较。不良 IRC 个体更有可能出现病程恶化(p<0.001)、强迫观念持续时间更长(p=0.017)、对称/秩序症状更严重(p<0.001)、污染/清洁(p<0.001)和囤积症(p=0.002),以及合并间歇性爆发障碍(p=0.026)、拔毛癖(p=0.014)和强迫性购物(p=0.040)。回归分析显示,强迫观念的持续时间(p=0.037)和囤积症的严重程度(p=0.005)是不良 IRC 的显著预测因子。在 OCD 中没有冲动性的特定测量方法的情况下,该研究强调了简单测量方法(如洞察力、对强迫行为的抵抗力和控制力)的实用性,作为具有冲动特征的 OCD 亚组的表型标志物,该亚组具有较差的临床预后。