• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

献血血管迷走神经反应的危险因素分析

Risk factor analysis of vasovagal reaction from blood donation.

作者信息

Takanashi Minoko, Odajima Takeshi, Aota Seiko, Sudoh Mitsuaki, Yamaga Yoshio, Ono Yuriko, Yoshinaga Kentaro, Motoji Toshiko, Matsuzaki Koji, Satake Masahiro, Sugimori Hiroki, Nakajima Kazunori

机构信息

Japanese Red Cross Tokyo Blood Centre, Tokyo 135-8639, Japan.

出版信息

Transfus Apher Sci. 2012 Dec;47(3):319-25. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.transci.2012.04.002
PMID:22647682
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vasovagal reaction (VVR) is the most frequent side effect at blood collection sites.

AIMS

To protect donors, factors contributing to VVR were analysed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Complications following whole blood and apheresis donations have been recorded and accumulated by the Japanese Red Cross Tokyo Blood Centre. A dataset of 43,948 donors who had no complications was prepared as a control by randomly selecting days in each season in the 2006 and 2007 fiscal years. Factors contributing to 4924 VVR incidents in the 2006 and 2007 fiscal years were analysed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The age, weight, body mass index (BMI), predonation systolic and diastolic pressure, and circulating blood volume were lower, and the pulse was higher, for the VVR group compared to the control group (p<0.0001). The VVR group had more female donors, less sleep, and more time since a meal than the control. In multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for 400 ml whole blood donors, which are the majority of donors, were an age <50 years, being female, a BMI <25, pulse ≥90/min, sleep duration <8 h, the time after eating ≥4 h, a first time donation and circulating blood volume of <4.3 l. Sleep duration of <6 h was shown to be a VVR risk as much as a first time donation.

CONCLUSION

From our analysis, the amount of sleep obtained the previous night should be considered at the reception of donors.

摘要

背景

血管迷走神经反应(VVR)是采血点最常见的副作用。

目的

为保护献血者,分析导致VVR的因素。

材料与方法

日本红十字会东京血液中心记录并积累了全血和单采献血后的并发症情况。通过随机选择2006财年和2007财年每个季节的日期,准备了一个由43948名无并发症献血者组成的数据集作为对照。通过单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析2006财年和2007财年4924例VVR事件的影响因素。

结果

与对照组相比,VVR组的年龄、体重、体重指数(BMI)、献血前收缩压和舒张压以及循环血量较低,脉搏较高(p<0.0001)。VVR组女性献血者更多,睡眠更少,进食后时间更长。在多因素分析中,对于大多数献血者(400ml全血献血者)来说,显著的危险因素包括年龄<50岁、女性、BMI<25、脉搏≥90次/分钟、睡眠时间<8小时、进食后时间≥4小时、首次献血以及循环血量<4.3升。睡眠时间<6小时被证明与首次献血一样是VVR的危险因素。

结论

根据我们的分析,在接待献血者时应考虑前一晚的睡眠量。

相似文献

1
Risk factor analysis of vasovagal reaction from blood donation.献血血管迷走神经反应的危险因素分析
Transfus Apher Sci. 2012 Dec;47(3):319-25. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 May 28.
2
Impact of Elevated Hemoglobin and Serum Protein on Vasovagal Reaction from Blood Donation.血红蛋白和血清蛋白升高对献血时血管迷走神经反应的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 19;11(2):e0148854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148854. eCollection 2016.
3
Case-control study of immediate and delayed vasovagal reactions in blood donors.献血者即刻和延迟血管迷走神经反应的病例对照研究。
Vox Sang. 2016 Oct;111(3):257-265. doi: 10.1111/vox.12418. Epub 2016 May 27.
4
Prevalence of immediate vasovagal reaction in blood donors visiting two blood banks of Karachi.访问卡拉奇两家血库的献血者中即刻血管迷走神经反应的发生率。
Transfus Med. 2010 Jun;20(3):129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2009.00984.x. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
5
Hemodynamic response during standing test after blood donation can predict the late phase vasovagal reaction.献血后站立试验期间的血流动力学反应可预测晚期血管迷走神经反应。
Heart Vessels. 2016 Dec;31(12):1997-2003. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0829-7. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
6
First-time whole blood donation: A critical step for donor safety and retention on first three donations.首次全血捐献:保障献血者安全及维持其头三次献血的关键一步。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2015 Oct-Dec;22(5-6):312-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
7
Vasovagal reactions in 'at risk' donors: a univariate analysis of effect of age and weight on the grade of donor reactions.“高危”供者的血管迷走神经反应:年龄和体重对供者反应分级影响的单因素分析
Transfus Apher Sci. 2008 Oct;39(2):95-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2008.07.010.
8
Interstitial fluid shifts to plasma compartment during blood donation.在献血过程中,间质液转移到血浆隔室。
Transfusion. 2013 Nov;53(11):2744-50. doi: 10.1111/trf.12120. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
9
Can we prevent vasovagal reactions in young inexperienced whole blood donors? A placebo controlled study comparing effects of a 330 vs 500 mL water drink prior to donation.我们能否预防年轻且缺乏经验的全血捐献者发生血管迷走神经反应?一项安慰剂对照研究,比较献血前饮用330毫升与500毫升水的效果。
Transfusion. 2019 Feb;59(2):555-565. doi: 10.1111/trf.15065. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
10
Vasovagal reactions in whole blood and apheresis donors: a cross-sectional study on donor haemovigilance data from 2016 to 2019 in Italy.意大利 2016 年至 2019 年全血和单采献血者献血不良反应的横断面研究:基于献血不良反应监测数据
Blood Transfus. 2022 Jul;20(4):281-291. doi: 10.2450/2021.0114-21. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency of vasovagal reactions in whole blood donation and contributing factors.全血捐献中血管迷走神经反应的发生率及相关因素。
Med Int (Lond). 2025 Feb 18;5(3):22. doi: 10.3892/mi.2025.221. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
2
Predicting vasovagal reactions to needles from video data using 2D-CNN with GRU and LSTM.使用带有门控循环单元(GRU)和长短期记忆网络(LSTM)的二维卷积神经网络(2D-CNN)从视频数据预测对针头的血管迷走神经反应。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0314038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314038. eCollection 2025.
3
Identifying new safety risk of human serum albumin: a retrospective study of real-world data.
识别人类血清白蛋白的新安全风险:一项基于真实世界数据的回顾性研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 15;15:1319900. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1319900. eCollection 2024.
4
Vasovagal Syncope during Office Hysteroscopy-A Frequently Overlooked Unpleasant Complication.在宫腔镜检查中发生的血管迷走性晕厥——一种经常被忽视的不愉快的并发症。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 11;58(11):1626. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111626.
5
Factors associated with vasovagal reactions in whole blood donors: A case-control study.全血捐献者血管迷走神经反应的相关因素:一项病例对照研究。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2022 Jan-Jun;16(1):41-49. doi: 10.4103/ajts.ajts_90_21. Epub 2022 May 26.
6
Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features.基于机器学习的献血过程中晕厥预测,使用供体特征和天气数据作为特征。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 20;22(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01971-x.
7
Blood Donation-Related Adverse Reactions: Results of an Online Survey among Donors in Germany (2018).献血相关不良反应:德国献血者在线调查结果(2018年)
Transfus Med Hemother. 2021 Mar 31;48(5):272-283. doi: 10.1159/000516049. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Incidence of adverse reaction in blood donation: a systematic review.献血不良反应发生率:一项系统评价
Am J Blood Res. 2020 Oct 15;10(5):145-150. eCollection 2020.
9
Characterization of an Artificial Liver Support System-Related Vasovagal Reaction.人工肝支持系统相关血管迷走神经反应的特征。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jul 13;2020:6313480. doi: 10.1155/2020/6313480. eCollection 2020.
10
Joint effects of risk factors on adverse events associated with adult blood donations.风险因素对成人献血相关不良事件的联合影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(44):e17758. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017758.