Shivhare Aaditya, Basavarajegowda Abhishekh, Harichandrakumar K T, Silwal Pragya, Raj Pruthvi
Department of Haematology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2022 Jan-Jun;16(1):41-49. doi: 10.4103/ajts.ajts_90_21. Epub 2022 May 26.
Vasovagal reactions to blood donation though generally mild and account for about 1% of donations, causes embarrassment/injury to the donors, lower likely return rates for future donations etc. The workforce hours devoted to attending to those who reacted can also affect the efficiency of the blood centre. There are various factors, both modifiable and nonmodifiable, involved in the causation of such reactions.
This study sought to identify the factors associated with vasovagal donor reactions in a case-control study.
This was a descriptive comparative study between donors who had VVRs (cases) and those who did not (controls) during or after blood donation from a single center in southern India. All the biophysical and demographic variables were collected from the donor records. In addition, a questionnaire was administered to the donors after donation within half an hour, addressing the psychosocial variables. All the data were captured in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS for Windows version 20.
A total of 178 donors who had donor reactions were included in the study with an equal number of controls who were age and sex-matched. Donors who had VVRs had an odds of 4.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-7.7) of admitted anxiety for blood donation. They also had an odds of 4.4 (95% CI: 2.8-6.9) of disturbed sleep the night before blood donation. Having an accompanying person to the blood center was detrimental, with an odds of 0.32 (95% CI: 0.2-0.6). Donors with local complications such as hematoma, double prick, or delayed collection had an odds of 21.2 (95% CI: 1.8-159.8) of developing VVR.
The psychosocial factors such as fear of the needle, the sight of the blood, state of mind, and quality and duration of sleep seem to have an association, adversely impacting the donors resulting in VVRs after/during blood donation.
献血时的血管迷走神经反应虽然通常较为轻微,约占献血情况的1%,但会给献血者带来尴尬/伤害,降低未来献血的可能性等。用于照料有反应者的工作时间也会影响血液中心的效率。此类反应的发生涉及多种因素,包括可改变的和不可改变的因素。
本病例对照研究旨在确定与血管迷走神经献血者反应相关的因素。
这是一项描述性比较研究,研究对象为印度南部一个中心在献血期间或献血后发生血管迷走神经反应(病例)和未发生反应(对照)的献血者。所有生物物理和人口统计学变量均从献血者记录中收集。此外,在献血后半小时内对献血者进行问卷调查,涉及社会心理变量。所有数据均录入Microsoft Excel,并使用SPSS for Windows 20版本进行分析。
共有178名有献血反应的献血者纳入研究,另有数量相等的年龄和性别匹配的对照者。发生血管迷走神经反应的献血者对献血承认有焦虑的几率为4.1(95%置信区间[CI]:2.4 - 7.7)。他们在献血前一晚睡眠受干扰的几率为4.4(95% CI:2.8 - 6.9)。有陪同人员前往血液中心是不利因素,几率为0.32(95% CI:0.2 - 0.6)。有局部并发症如血肿、双针穿刺或采血延迟的献血者发生血管迷走神经反应的几率为21.2(95% CI:1.8 - 159.8)。
诸如对针头的恐惧、看到血液、心理状态以及睡眠质量和时长等社会心理因素似乎存在关联,会对献血者产生不利影响,导致献血后/献血期间发生血管迷走神经反应。