Suppr超能文献

[昏迷患者多模态感觉诱发电位的神经生理学评估:一般情况]

[Neurophysiological evaluation using multimodal sensory evoked potentials in patients in coma: general aspects].

作者信息

Luccas F J, Lopes J A, Plastino F R, Knobel E

机构信息

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (HIAE), São Paulo, Brasil.

出版信息

Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1990 Sep;48(3):320-8. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x1990000300009.

Abstract

Noninvasive sensory evoked potentials (SEP) performed at bedside in the Intensive Care Unit for patients in coma can be helpful in establishing both a diagnosis and a prognosis. Based on a more than 6-year experience on this subject, the authors discuss general aspects concerning these EP, their probable known generators, and propose a classification depicting different aspects observed for flash visual EP (F-VEP), brainstem auditory EP (BAEP), and median nerve somato-sensory EP (SSEP). Isolated, SSEP shows the best diagnostic and prognostic performance. Nevertheless, the authors consider that multimodality SEP are even better than any isolated EP study; cross-correlating information generated through a horizontal (F-VEP), a vertical (SSEP), and a pathway focusing brainstem in greater detail (BAEP) allows the neurophysiological establishment of the level of lesion in the CNS from a better perspective; besides, SEP can help setting the diagnosis of brain (encephalic) death, and the diagnosis of particular problems concerning each pathway. Notwithstanding, most important is prognosis definition, and the findings are summarized. Abnormal BAEP implies bad prognosis, as would be expected considering the severity of a brainstem lesion; on the other hand, a normal BAEP per se does not allow a precise definition, resting on other EP the role prognosis characterization. SSEP if bilaterally normal or only mildly abnormal imply good prognosis; bilateral absence of SSEP thalamo-cortical components has always carried a bad prognosis, since younger patients may at best evolve into a persistent vegetative state; SSEP intermediary results are more often accompanied by variable evolution. FVEP results parallel those of SSEP.

摘要

在重症监护病房对昏迷患者进行床边无创感觉诱发电位(SEP)检查,有助于做出诊断和判断预后。基于6年多在此方面的经验,作者讨论了这些诱发电位的一般情况、可能的已知起源,并提出了一种分类方法,描述了闪光视觉诱发电位(F-VEP)、脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)和正中神经体感诱发电位(SSEP)所观察到的不同方面。单独来看,SSEP显示出最佳的诊断和预后性能。然而,作者认为多模式SEP甚至比任何单独的诱发电位研究更好;将通过水平方向(F-VEP)、垂直方向(SSEP)以及更详细聚焦脑干的路径(BAEP)产生的信息进行相互关联,能让神经生理学从更好的角度确定中枢神经系统病变的水平;此外,SEP有助于确定脑(脑性)死亡的诊断以及与每条路径相关的特定问题的诊断。尽管如此,最重要的是预后的定义,并对研究结果进行了总结。正如预期的那样,考虑到脑干病变的严重性,异常的BAEP意味着预后不良;另一方面,单纯正常的BAEP本身并不能给出精确的定义,还需依靠其他诱发电位来进行预后特征描述。如果SSEP双侧正常或仅轻度异常,则意味着预后良好;双侧缺乏SSEP丘脑-皮质成分一直预示着预后不良,因为年轻患者最多可能发展为持续性植物状态;SSEP的中间结果更常伴有多变的病情发展。FVEP的结果与SSEP的结果相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验