Laboratory of Molecular and Translational Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo 04039-032, Brazil.
Horm Cancer. 2012 Aug;3(4):181-6. doi: 10.1007/s12672-012-0109-7. Epub 2012 May 31.
RET sequencing has become an important tool in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) evaluation and should be performed even in the absence of family history of MTC. The most commonly studied exons in index cases are 8, 10, 11, and 13-16. To address the ATA guidelines regarding the sequencing of the entire coding region of RET, we selected 50 patients with sporadic MTC (sMTC) without mutations in the hot spot regions of RET for extended investigation of exons 1-7, 9, 12, 17, 18, and 19. Twenty-seven of 50 patients presented with one or more features suggesting familial disease. We found only a new RET variant (p.Gly550Glu) in one patient with MTC. Several polymorphisms were observed, and their frequency was histogram scaled by exons and introns. Eight patients were also included for somatic mutation search. We estimated the sequencing cost by stratifying into four investigation approaches: (1) hot spot exons in a new patient, (2) the remaining exons if the hot spots are negative in a patient with suspected familial disease, (3) a relative of a carrier for a known RET mutation, and (4) tumor sequencing. In spite of the increasing number of variants being described in MTC, it appears that there is no direct clinical benefit in extending RET germ line analysis beyond the hot spot regions in sMTC. The cost evaluation in apparent sMTC using a tiered approach may help clinicians make more suitable decisions regarding the benefits of investigating only the hot spots against the entire coding region of RET.
RET 测序已成为甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)评估的重要工具,即使在没有 MTC 家族史的情况下也应进行。在索引病例中最常研究的外显子是 8、10、11 和 13-16。为了解决 ATA 指南中关于 RET 整个编码区测序的问题,我们选择了 50 例无 RET 热点区域突变的散发性 MTC(sMTC)患者进行扩展研究,以研究外显子 1-7、9、12、17、18 和 19。50 例患者中有 27 例表现出一种或多种提示家族性疾病的特征。我们仅在一名 MTC 患者中发现了一种新的 RET 变体(p.Gly550Glu)。观察到了几种多态性,并按外显子和内含子对其频率进行了直方图缩放。还对 8 例患者进行了体细胞突变搜索。我们通过分层为四种研究方法估算测序成本:(1)新患者的热点外显子,(2)疑似家族性疾病患者热点阴性的其余外显子,(3)已知 RET 突变携带者的亲属,以及(4)肿瘤测序。尽管在 MTC 中描述了越来越多的变体,但似乎在 sMTC 中扩展 RET 种系分析超出热点区域并没有直接的临床获益。使用分层方法对明显的 sMTC 进行成本评估可能有助于临床医生在仅针对 RET 热点区域与整个编码区进行调查的收益方面做出更合适的决策。