Harvard Neuroendocrine Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Neurology. 2012 Jun 12;78(24):1959-66. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318259e1f9. Epub 2012 May 30.
To assess progesterone treatment of intractable seizures in women with partial epilepsy.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III, multicenter, clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of adjunctive cyclic natural progesterone therapy vs placebo treatment of intractable seizures in 294 subjects randomized 2:1 to progesterone or placebo, stratified by catamenial and noncatamenial status. It compared treatments on proportions of ≥50% responders and changes in seizure frequency from 3 baseline to 3 treated menstrual cycles.
There was no significant difference in proportions of responders between progesterone and placebo in the catamenial and noncatamenial strata. Prespecified secondary analysis showed that the level of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation (C1 level) was a significant predictor of responders for progesterone but not placebo. With increasing C1 levels, responders increased from 21% to 57% with progesterone vs 19% to 20% with placebo. Reductions in seizure frequency correlated with increasing C1 levels for progesterone but not placebo, progressing from 26% to 71% for progesterone vs 25% to 26% for placebo. A prespecified clinically important separation between progesterone and placebo responders (37.8% vs 11.1%; p = 0.037) was realized among 21.4% of women who had C1 level ≥3.
There was no difference in the primary outcome of ≥50% responder rates between progesterone vs placebo for catamenial or noncatamenial groups. Post hoc findings suggest that the level of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation is a significant predictor of responder rate with progesterone and that progesterone may provide clinically important benefit for a subset of women with perimenstrually exacerbated seizures.
This study provides Class III evidence that cyclic progesterone is ineffective in women with intractable partial epilepsy. Post hoc analysis identified a subset of women with higher levels of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation that were responsive to treatment.
评估孕激素治疗部分性癫痫女性难治性癫痫发作。
这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、III 期、多中心临床试验比较了辅助周期性天然孕激素治疗与安慰剂治疗 294 例随机分为孕激素或安慰剂 2:1 的难治性癫痫发作的疗效和安全性,分层因素为月经周期和非月经周期状态。比较了治疗方法在≥50%应答者的比例和从 3 个基线到 3 个治疗月经周期的癫痫发作频率变化。
在月经周期和非月经周期分层中,孕激素和安慰剂的应答者比例无显著差异。预先指定的二次分析显示,围经期癫痫发作加重(C1 水平)是孕激素应答者的一个显著预测因素,但不是安慰剂的预测因素。随着 C1 水平的升高,孕激素的应答者从 21%增加到 57%,而安慰剂从 19%增加到 20%。随着 C1 水平的升高,孕激素的癫痫发作频率降低,从 26%增加到 71%,而安慰剂从 25%增加到 26%。在 C1 水平≥3 的 21.4%的女性中,孕激素和安慰剂应答者之间(37.8%比 11.1%;p=0.037)实现了预先指定的临床重要分离。
孕激素与安慰剂相比,在月经周期或非月经周期组的主要结局(≥50%应答者率)没有差异。事后发现提示围经期癫痫发作加重的程度是孕激素应答率的一个显著预测因素,孕激素可能对围经期癫痫发作加重的女性亚组提供临床重要的益处。
这项研究提供了 III 级证据,表明周期性孕激素对难治性部分性癫痫女性无效。事后分析确定了一个具有较高围经期癫痫发作加重水平的女性亚组,对治疗有反应。