Köppel René, Eugster Albert, Ruf Jürg, Rentsch Jürg
Official Food Control Authority of the Canton of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
J AOAC Int. 2012 Mar-Apr;95(2):494-9. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.11-115.
The quantification of meat proportions in raw and boiled sausage according to the recipe was evaluated using three different calibrators. To measure the DNA contents from beef, pork, sheep (mutton), and horse, a tetraplex real-time PCR method was applied. Nineteen laboratories analyzed four meat products each made of different proportions of beef, pork, sheep, and horse meat. Three kinds of calibrators were used: raw and boiled sausages of known proportions ranging from 1 to 55% of meat, and a dilution series of DNA from muscle tissue. In general, results generated using calibration sausages were more accurate than those resulting from the use of DNA from muscle tissue, and exhibited smaller measurement uncertainties. Although differences between uses of raw and boiled calibration sausages were small, the most precise and accurate results were obtained by calibration with fine-textured boiled reference sausages.
使用三种不同的校准物对生香肠和煮制香肠中按配方的肉类比例进行了定量评估。为了测量牛肉、猪肉、绵羊(羊肉)和马肉的DNA含量,采用了四重实时PCR方法。19个实验室分析了四种分别由不同比例的牛肉、猪肉、绵羊和马肉制成的肉制品。使用了三种校准物:已知肉类比例从1%到55%的生香肠和煮制香肠,以及肌肉组织DNA的稀释系列。总体而言,使用校准香肠产生的结果比使用肌肉组织DNA产生的结果更准确,并且测量不确定度更小。尽管生校准香肠和煮制校准香肠的使用差异很小,但使用质地细腻的煮制参考香肠进行校准可获得最精确和准确的结果。