Division of Metabolism, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Jun;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S22-32. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0095.
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is common in patients with diabetes. Reasons for this are multifactorial, but all relate to a variety of maladaptive responses to acute hyperglycemia. Persistent hyperglycemia is associated with worse left ventricular function and higher mortality during AMI, but intervention data are far from clear. Although there is a theoretical basis for the use of glucose-insulin-potassium infusion during AMI, lack of outcome efficacy (and inability to reach glycemic targets) in recent randomized trials has resulted in little enthusiasm for this strategy. Based on the increasing understanding of the dangers of hypoglycemia, while at the same time appreciating the role of hyperglycemia in AMI patients, goal glucose levels of 140-180 mg/dL using an intravenous insulin infusion while not eating seem reasonable for most patients and hospital systems. Non-glycemic therapy for patients with diabetes and AMI has benefited from more conclusive data, as this population has greater morbidity and mortality than those without diabetes. For ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), reperfusion therapy with primary percutaneous coronary intervention or fibrinolysis, antithrombotic therapy to prevent acute stent thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention or rethrombosis following thrombolysis, and initiation of β-blocker therapy are the current standard of care. Emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery is reserved for the most critically ill. For those with non-STEMI, initial reperfusion therapy or fibrinolysis is not routinely indicated. Overall, there have been dramatic advances for the treatment of people with AMI and diabetes. The use of continuous glucose monitoring in this population may allow better ability to safely reach glycemic targets, which it is hoped will improve glycemic control.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)在糖尿病患者中很常见。原因是多方面的,但都与急性高血糖的各种适应性不良反应有关。持续性高血糖与 AMI 期间左心室功能恶化和死亡率升高有关,但干预数据远不清楚。尽管在 AMI 期间使用葡萄糖-胰岛素-钾输注有理论依据,但最近的随机试验缺乏疗效(并且无法达到血糖目标),因此对这种策略的热情不高。基于对低血糖危险的认识不断增加,同时认识到高血糖在 AMI 患者中的作用,对于大多数患者和医院系统来说,在不进食的情况下使用静脉胰岛素输注将血糖目标控制在 140-180mg/dL 似乎是合理的。对于患有糖尿病和 AMI 的患者,非血糖治疗也得益于更具结论性的数据,因为与没有糖尿病的患者相比,该人群的发病率和死亡率更高。对于 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI),采用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或溶栓进行再灌注治疗,抗血栓治疗以预防经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的急性支架血栓形成或溶栓后的再血栓形成,以及开始β受体阻滞剂治疗是目前的标准治疗方法。紧急冠状动脉旁路移植术保留给病情最危急的患者。对于非 STEMI 患者,通常不常规指示初始再灌注治疗或溶栓治疗。总的来说,AMI 和糖尿病患者的治疗取得了显著进展。在该人群中使用连续血糖监测可能会更好地安全达到血糖目标,这有望改善血糖控制。