Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Eur J Haematol. 2012 Sep;89(3):206-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2012.01811.x. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC)-alloSCT is increasingly used for acute myelogenous leukemia. Limited data are available for the comparison of peripheral blood stem cells with bone marrow for RIC-alloSCT. We used the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) ALWP data to compare the outcome of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) (n = 1430) vs. bone marrow (BM) (n = 107) for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients with complete remission that underwent RIC-alloSCT from compatible sibling donors. The leukemia features, the disease status, and the time from diagnosis were similar between the two groups. Engraftment was achieved in 99% and 93% in the PBSC and BM groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). The day of engraftment was significantly earlier for the PBSC vs. the BM group, 15 (1-59) and 19 (5-69), respectively (P < 0.001). Acute GVHD, severe GVHD (grade III-IV) and chronic GVHD did not differ between the groups. leukemia-free survival (LFS), relapse, and non-relapsed mortality (NRM) were 51 ± 2%, 32 ± 1%, and 17 ± 1% vs. 50 ± 6%, 38 ± 6%, and 12 ± 3% for the PBSC and BM groups, respectively. Our results indicate faster engraftment, but no difference in GVHD, LFS, relapse, and NRM when comparing PBSC to BM grafts from sibling donors following RIC conditioning. This is the first study comparing PBSC to BM grafts in the RIC setting, analyzing a homogeneous population of patients with AML in remission. Whether PBSC should be preferred for advanced phases of the disease, where the outcome is dominated by relapse incidences, needs further investigation.
对于急性髓系白血病患者,采用低强度预处理(RIC)异基因造血干细胞移植(alloSCT)的情况越来越多。目前仅有少量数据比较 RIC-alloSCT 中采用外周血造血干细胞(PBSC)和骨髓(BM)的结果。我们使用欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会(EBMT)ALWP 数据,比较了 1430 例接受同胞供者 RIC-alloSCT 且处于完全缓解期的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者中,PBSC (n=1430)与 BM (n=107)两组患者的结局。两组患者的白血病特征、疾病状态和从诊断到移植的时间相似。两组患者的植入率分别为 99%和 93%(P<0.0001)。PBSC 组患者的植入时间显著早于 BM 组,分别为 15(1-59)和 19(5-69)(P<0.001)。两组患者的急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)、重度 GVHD(III-IV 级)和慢性 GVHD 无差异。两组患者的无白血病生存(LFS)、复发和非复发相关死亡率(NRM)分别为 51±2%、32±1%和 17±1% vs. 50±6%、38±6%和 12±3%。我们的结果表明,与 BM 移植物相比,同胞供者 RIC 预处理后 PBSC 移植患者的植入更快,但 GVHD、LFS、复发和 NRM 无差异。这是第一项比较 RIC 预处理中 PBSC 与 BM 移植物的研究,分析了处于缓解期的 AML 患者的同质人群。PBSC 是否应优先用于疾病晚期阶段(复发发生率是影响结果的主要因素),还需要进一步研究。