Van Nortwick Sara S, Yao Jeffrey, Ladd Amy L
Chase Hand Center and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jul;37(7):1388-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.04.027. Epub 2012 May 30.
Increasingly, surgeons treat distal radius fractures with locking plate systems. Recent case reports have focused on technical insertion errors resulting in removal difficulties: poor drilling orientation or cross-threading, destruction of the screw head, and filling of the screw recess with tissue. We report 2 complications of titanium locked plate removal secondary to in vivo reactions including titanium integration with bone and mechanical binding between the titanium screw and plate. We clarify and discuss terminology relevant to implant removal, including cold-welding, galling, fretting, and anodization. Even with optimal technique, in situ reactions can complicate titanium implant removal.
外科医生越来越多地使用锁定钢板系统治疗桡骨远端骨折。最近的病例报告集中在导致取出困难的技术插入错误上:钻孔方向不佳或螺纹交叉、螺钉头部损坏以及螺钉凹槽被组织填充。我们报告了2例因体内反应导致钛锁定钢板取出的并发症,包括钛与骨的融合以及钛螺钉与钢板之间的机械性结合。我们阐明并讨论了与植入物取出相关的术语,包括冷焊、擦伤、微动磨损和阳极氧化。即使采用最佳技术,原位反应也会使钛植入物的取出变得复杂。