Shiers-Gelalis Fleur, Matthews Hannah, Rodham Paul, Giannoudis Vasileios P, Giannoudis Peter V
Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Health Education Yorkshire and Humber, Doncaster DN2 5LT, UK.
York District Hospital, York, Health Education Yorkshire and Humber, York YO31 8HE, UK.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 27;14(13):4564. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134564.
Cold welding is an anecdotally well-known complication of removal of metalwork, most commonly at the screw-plate interface, and can often complicate extraction of implants after fracture fixation. Even though this phenomenon is familiar amongst the orthopedic community, there is relatively little formalized discussion or literature pertaining to its identification and management clinically. In addition, as far as we can establish, there does not seem to be a paper that discusses the various techniques described in the literature that are employed to combat cold welding. A systematic review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA guidance, with two independent reviewers and a third person to arbitrate for any discrepancies. Manuscripts were identified using a search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar. Studies eligible for inclusion were tabulated and the results categorized qualitatively with respect to the technique described for removal of the implants. A total of 272 manuscripts were identified using a search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar, and of these 14 were ruled to be eligible for inclusion reporting on 292 patients. Common locations of the cold-welded screws included femur, tibia, distal radius and clavicle. The most common technique for metalwork removal was using either bolt cutters or burrs to cut the plates between the screws and mobilize the screw and plate as one unit. Other techniques included using specialized removal tools and cutting between the screw head and body. There was no appreciable correlation between the specific anatomic location of the welded implant and the technique used in its removal. From the studies, it was found that, of the total number of screws (n = 1654), 58 (3.5%) were cold welded. The mean time to metalwork removal was 1104 days (36.8 months). As far as we can tell, this is the first systematic review pertaining to the phenomenon of cold welding specifically, and with this project we have collated the techniques used to remove implants affected by cold welding from a variety of different articles. Our work aims to highlight the relative paucity of literature in this area and provide a number of accessible and safe techniques to facilitate the removal of cold-welded implants in fracture fixation.
冷焊是取出金属内固定物时一种广为人知的并发症,最常见于螺钉-钢板界面,并且常常会使骨折固定后植入物的取出变得复杂。尽管这种现象在骨科领域为人熟知,但临床上关于其识别和处理的正式讨论和文献相对较少。此外,据我们所知,似乎没有一篇论文讨论过文献中描述的用于对抗冷焊的各种技术。按照PRISMA指南进行了一项系统综述,由两名独立评审员和第三人对任何分歧进行仲裁。通过搜索PubMed/MEDLINE和谷歌学术来识别手稿。将符合纳入标准的研究制成表格,并根据所描述的植入物取出技术对结果进行定性分类。通过搜索PubMed/MEDLINE和谷歌学术共识别出272篇手稿,其中14篇被判定符合纳入标准,报道了292例患者。冷焊螺钉的常见部位包括股骨、胫骨、桡骨远端和锁骨。取出金属内固定物最常用的技术是使用断线钳或磨头切断螺钉之间的钢板,将螺钉和钢板作为一个整体松动。其他技术包括使用专门的取出工具以及在螺钉头部和主体之间进行切割。焊接植入物的具体解剖位置与取出所使用的技术之间没有明显的相关性。从研究中发现,在螺钉总数(n = 1654)中,有58枚(3.5%)发生了冷焊。取出金属内固定物的平均时间为1104天(36.8个月)。据我们所知,这是第一篇专门针对冷焊现象的系统综述,通过这个项目,我们从各种不同的文章中整理了用于取出受冷焊影响的植入物的技术。我们的工作旨在强调该领域文献相对匮乏的情况,并提供一些可行且安全的技术,以促进骨折固定中冷焊植入物的取出。