The CORE Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States; University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
HealthPartners Orthopedics, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Injury. 2024 Nov;55(11):111824. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111824. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
Titanium implants are commonly used for surgical fixation in orthopedic trauma, and have many benefits compared to stainless steel implants. Despite these benefits, some orthopedic surgeons remain hesitant to use titanium implants due to concerns of difficulty with future implant removal, given concerns with cold-welding and screw strippage. The objective of this study was to assess difficulties associated with titanium plate and screw implant removal.
This is a retrospective case series from a large hospital system. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 20,680 from 2017 to 2020. Patients were included if they had removal of titanium plate and screws from the upper or lower extremity, were at least18 years of age, and considered skeletally mature. The ease of titanium plate/screw removal was determined by assessing for implant cold-welding, broken screws, stripped screws, and the need for advanced tools (screw removal set, trephine, burr).
157 patients were identified, with a mean age of 54 years and 59 % female. In total 1274 screws were removed: 14 (1.1 %) were stripped, 8 (0.6 %) were cold-welded, 42 (3.3 %) were loose, and 13 (1.0 %) were broken. 183 plates were removed in total, and 15 (8.2 %) had bone overgrowth that required removal. 12 (7.6 %) procedures were complicated and required the use of advanced tools. Complicated implant removal operations occurred after significantly longer in vivo implant time (mean of 3.7 vs. 1.1 years, p = 0.036), were associated with a younger age, were more likely to occur in lower extremity procedures (p = 0.034), and took significantly longer time for removal (95 vs. 42 min, p < 0.001).
Despite concerns with titanium implants, we found a low rate of screw strippage, breakage, and cold welding during the removal process. However, 7.6 % of the 157 surgeries required additional tools other than just a screwdriver, and needed additional operative time. This information allows treating surgeons to plan for implant removal when titanium implants have been used for fixation.
IV.
钛植入物常用于骨科创伤的手术固定,与不锈钢植入物相比具有许多优势。尽管有这些好处,但一些骨科医生仍然对使用钛植入物犹豫不决,因为担心未来植入物取出困难,考虑到冷焊接和螺丝滑丝的问题。本研究的目的是评估与钛板和螺丝植入物取出相关的困难。
这是一项来自大型医院系统的回顾性病例系列研究。使用 2017 年至 2020 年的当前程序术语(CPT)代码 20,680 识别患者。如果患者进行了上肢或下肢钛板和螺钉的取出、年龄至少 18 岁且被认为骨骼成熟,则将其纳入研究。通过评估植入物冷焊接、断钉、滑丝以及是否需要使用高级工具(螺钉取出套件、环钻、钻头)来确定钛板/螺钉取出的难易程度。
共确定了 157 名患者,平均年龄为 54 岁,女性占 59%。共取出 1274 颗螺钉:14 颗(1.1%)滑丝,8 颗(0.6%)冷焊接,42 颗(3.3%)松动,13 颗(1.0%)断裂。总共取出 183 块板,其中 15 块(8.2%)有骨过度生长,需要取出。12 例(7.6%)手术较为复杂,需要使用高级工具。复杂的植入物取出操作发生在体内植入物时间明显更长(平均 3.7 年 vs. 1.1 年,p=0.036),与年龄较小、更可能发生在下肢手术(p=0.034)以及取出时间明显更长(95 分钟 vs. 42 分钟,p<0.001)有关。
尽管存在对钛植入物的担忧,但我们发现,在取出过程中,螺钉滑丝、断裂和冷焊接的发生率较低。然而,157 例手术中有 7.6%需要除螺丝刀以外的其他工具,且需要额外的手术时间。这些信息使治疗医生在使用钛植入物固定时可以计划植入物取出。
IV。