• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国全民健康保险下的医疗服务可及性公平性

Equity of access under Korean universal health insurance.

作者信息

Park Ju Moon

机构信息

University of Incheon, Incheon, South Korea

出版信息

Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Mar;27(2):NP914-24. doi: 10.1177/1010539512446961. Epub 2012 May 31.

DOI:10.1177/1010539512446961
PMID:22652252
Abstract

This study examined the extent to which equity in the use of physician services has been achieved in the Republic of Korea. Descriptive and logistic regression analysis was performed examining the relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variables and the relative importance of factors. The results indicate that a universal health insurance system has not yielded a fully equitable distribution of services. Access differences arise from coverage limitation, as well as urban/rural variations in the distributions of providers. The policy options for expansion of coverage should be encouraged to ease the financial burden of out-of-pocket payments on patients and to limit the range of noninsured services. Urban/rural variations in the distributions of providers are caused by the government's "laissez-faire" policy for the private medical sector. To solve this geographic misdistribution, the attention of policy makers is required, with changing of the government's "laissez-faire" policy.

摘要

本研究考察了韩国在医生服务利用方面的公平性实现程度。进行了描述性和逻辑回归分析,以检验因变量与自变量之间的关系以及各因素的相对重要性。结果表明,全民健康保险制度并未实现服务的完全公平分配。获得服务的差异源于保险覆盖范围的限制,以及医疗服务提供者分布的城乡差异。应鼓励采取扩大保险覆盖范围的政策选项,以减轻患者自付费用的经济负担,并限制未参保服务的范围。医疗服务提供者分布的城乡差异是由政府对私立医疗部门的“放任”政策造成的。为解决这种地理分布不均的问题,需要政策制定者予以关注,改变政府的“放任”政策。

相似文献

1
Equity of access under Korean universal health insurance.韩国全民健康保险下的医疗服务可及性公平性
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Mar;27(2):NP914-24. doi: 10.1177/1010539512446961. Epub 2012 May 31.
2
Is there equity in oral healthcare utilization: experience after achieving Universal Coverage.口腔保健利用方面存在公平性吗:全民覆盖后的经验。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;37(1):85-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2008.00449.x.
3
Equity of access to primary care among older adults in Incheon, South Korea.韩国仁川老年人对初级保健的可及性公平性。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012 Nov;24(6):953-60. doi: 10.1177/1010539511409392. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
4
Egalitarian health policy preference and its related factors in Korea: national representative sample survey.韩国的平等主义健康政策偏好及其相关因素:全国代表性样本调查
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Jun;30(6):676-81. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.6.676. Epub 2015 May 13.
5
Outcome-based health equity across different social health insurance schemes for the elderly in China.中国老年人不同社会医疗保险计划基于结果的健康公平性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 14;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1261-5.
6
"I go I die, I stay I die, better to stay and die in my house": understanding the barriers to accessing health care in Timor-Leste.“我走我死,我留我死,不如留在家里等死”:理解东帝汶获得医疗保健的障碍。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 30;16(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1762-2.
7
The determinants of long-term care utilization and equity of access to care among older adults in Dong-Ku of Incheon Metropolitan city, South Korea.韩国仁川广域市东区老年人长期护理利用的决定因素及护理可及性公平性
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2005;17(2):104-9. doi: 10.1177/101053950501700208.
8
Equity in health financing of Guangxi after China's universal health coverage: evidence based on health expenditure comparison in rural Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region from 2009 to 2013.广西全民健康覆盖后卫生筹资公平性研究:基于 2009-2013 年广西壮族自治区农村地区卫生支出比较的证据
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Sep 29;16(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0669-9.
9
Equitable access to health insurance for socially excluded children? The case of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Ghana.社会排斥儿童的健康保险公平获取?加纳国家健康保险计划(NHIS)案例。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Aug;186:10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Equity in financing and use of health care in Ghana, South Africa, and Tanzania: implications for paths to universal coverage.加纳、南非和坦桑尼亚的卫生保健筹资和使用中的公平性:对实现全民覆盖途径的影响。
Lancet. 2012 Jul 14;380(9837):126-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60357-2. Epub 2012 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Effect of Income Level on Mortality after Stroke: A Nationwide Cohort Study in South Korea.长期收入水平对卒中后死亡率的影响:韩国全国队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 11;17(22):8348. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228348.
2
Determinants of health care utilisation: the case of Timor-Leste.医疗保健利用的决定因素:东帝汶的案例
Int Health. 2018 Nov 1;10(6):412-420. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihy044.
3
Equity in the utilization of physician and inpatient hospital services: evidence from Korean health panel survey.
医生和住院医院服务利用的公平性:来自韩国健康面板调查的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Sep 29;15(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0452-3.
4
Equity of access under Korean national long-term care insurance: implications for long-term care reform.韩国国家长期护理保险下的获得公平性:对长期护理改革的启示
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Sep 15;14:82. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0210-y.
5
Health status and health services utilization in elderly Koreans.韩国老年人的健康状况与医疗服务利用情况
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Aug 27;13:73. doi: 10.1186/s12939-014-0073-7.