Suppr超能文献

α 角在鉴别凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击症有症状患者和无症状志愿者方面有多大作用?

How useful is the alpha angle for discriminating between symptomatic patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and asymptomatic volunteers?

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Radiology. 2012 Aug;264(2):514-21. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112479. Epub 2012 May 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the alpha-angle measurements in volunteers and patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and to develop potential threshold values.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional review board; all individuals signed informed consent. Magnetic resonance (MR) images at 1.5 T in 106 individuals (ages 20-50 years) were analyzed in 53 patients (33 cam- and 20 mixed-type FAI) and 53 age- and sex-matched asymptomatic volunteers. Alpha angles were measured on radially reformatted MR images of the proximal femur by two independent readers. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean alpha angles were highest in the anterosuperior segment: 65.4° ± 11.5 [standard deviation] and 65.2° ± 7.3 for readers 1 and 2 in patients and 53.3° ± 9.6 and 55.0° ± 8.8 in volunteers, respectively (P < .001, patients vs volunteers). Alpha angles greater than 55° were measured in 20 (38%) and 33 (62%) of 53 volunteers for readers 1 and 2, respectively. Maximal alpha angle in any segment was substantially different (P < .001) in patients and volunteers (70.3° ± 11.2 vs 57.9° ± 10.5 for reader 1; 69.4° ± 8.8 vs 58.7° ± 8.9 for reader 2), with a large overlap. Overall interobserver agreement was good (ICC, 0.712). ROC showed the largest area under the curve at the anterosuperior segment: 0.791 and 0.824 for readers 1 and 2, respectively (P < .001). A 55° alpha-angle threshold value gave a sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 65% for reader 1 and of 90% and 47% for reader 2, respectively. A 60° alpha-angle threshold value gave a sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 76% for reader 1 and 80% and 73% for reader 2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is substantial overlap in the alpha-angle measurements between volunteers and patients with cam-type deformities. Discrimination is best at the anterosuperior segment. Increasing the alpha-angle threshold value from 55° to 60° reduces false-positive results while maintaining a reasonable sensitivity.

摘要

目的

比较髋关节撞击综合征(FAI)患者和志愿者的α角测量值,并制定潜在的阈值。

材料与方法

本研究经机构审查委员会批准,所有个体均签署知情同意书。在 106 名(20-50 岁)个体的 1.5T 磁共振(MR)图像中,对 53 名患者(33 名凸轮型和 20 名混合型 FAI)和 53 名年龄和性别匹配的无症状志愿者进行了分析。通过两位独立的读者在股骨近端的放射状重建成像上测量α角。计算组内相关系数(ICC)和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

在前上节段α角最大:患者中,读者 1 和 2 测量值分别为 65.4°±11.5(标准差)和 65.2°±7.3;志愿者中,测量值分别为 53.3°±9.6 和 55.0°±8.8(P<.001,患者与志愿者比较)。对于读者 1 和 2,志愿者中分别有 20 名(38%)和 33 名(62%)的α角大于 55°。任何节段的最大α角在患者和志愿者之间差异显著(P<.001)(读者 1:70.3°±11.2 vs 57.9°±10.5;读者 2:69.4°±8.8 vs 58.7°±8.9),并且重叠较大。总体观察者间一致性良好(ICC,0.712)。ROC 显示前上节段的曲线下面积最大:读者 1 和 2 分别为 0.791 和 0.824(P<.001)。55°α角阈值的敏感性和特异性分别为读者 1 的 81%和 65%,读者 2 的 90%和 47%。60°α角阈值的敏感性和特异性分别为读者 1 的 72%和 76%,读者 2 的 80%和 73%。

结论

凸轮型畸形患者与志愿者的α角测量值有很大的重叠。在前上节段的区分度最佳。将α角阈值从 55°增加到 60°可降低假阳性结果,同时保持合理的敏感性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验