Suppr超能文献

超越阿尔法角:评估股骨髋臼撞击症凸轮型畸形的替代测量方法。

Beyond the alpha angle: Alternative measurements for quantifying cam-type deformities in femoroacetabular impingement.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland.

University of Zurich, Faculty of Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Oct;42(4):1024-31. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24861. Epub 2015 Feb 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess alternative measurements to the alpha angle as a tool for distinguishing between symptomatic and asymptomatic cam-type deformities of the femoral head.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 106 individuals (age 20-50 years) from a previous study on the alpha angle were analyzed, including 53 femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) patients with cam-type deformities and 53 age-/sex-matched asymptomatic volunteers. On radially reformatted MR images two independent radiologists assessed femoral offset and femoral distance (FD) around the femoral head circumference. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were obtained.

RESULTS

The mean offset was smallest in the anterosuperior position for both readers: reader 1 measured 6.2 ± 2.9 mm (standard deviation) in patients and 7.3 ± 1.8 mm in volunteers (P = 0.002, patients vs. volunteers); reader 2 measured 6.1 ± 3.3 mm in patients and 7.1 ± 2.9 mm in volunteers (P = 0.111). The mean FD was highest in the anterosuperior position for reader 1 (patients 3.3 ± 1.4 mm; volunteers 1.7 ± 2.2 mm; P < 0.001) and in the anterior position for reader 2 (patients 3.1 ± 1.7 mm; volunteers 2.0 ± 1.5 mm; P = 0.001). Overall interobserver agreement (ICC) was good (offset 0.657/FD 0.632). ROC analysis for offset measurements showed the largest area under the curve in anterosuperior position for reader 1 (0.666) and in posterosuperior position for reader 2 (0.612). For FD measurements, the area under the curve was largest in anterosuperior position for both readers (0.793/0.798).

CONCLUSION

While FD measurements were superior to offset measurements and showed similar results to the alpha angle, neither FD nor offset measurements are a reliable tool for discrimination between FAI patients with cam-type deformities and asymptomatic volunteers.

摘要

目的

评估 alpha 角的替代测量方法,作为区分症状性和无症状性股骨头凸轮畸形的工具。

材料与方法

对先前 alpha 角研究中的 106 名个体(20-50 岁)的磁共振成像(MRI)检查进行分析,包括 53 名股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)伴凸轮畸形患者和 53 名年龄/性别匹配的无症状志愿者。在放射状重建成像上,两名独立的放射科医生评估了股骨头周围的股骨偏移和股骨距离(FD)。获得了组内相关系数(ICC)和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

两位读者均发现,在前后上位置时,偏移量最小:读者 1 测量的患者组为 6.2±2.9mm(标准差),志愿者组为 7.3±1.8mm(P=0.002,患者 vs. 志愿者);读者 2 测量的患者组为 6.1±3.3mm,志愿者组为 7.1±2.9mm(P=0.111)。对于读者 1,FD 均值在前上位置最高(患者组为 3.3±1.4mm;志愿者组为 1.7±2.2mm;P<0.001),对于读者 2,FD 均值在前侧位置最高(患者组为 3.1±1.7mm;志愿者组为 2.0±1.5mm;P=0.001)。总体观察者间一致性(ICC)良好(偏移量 0.657/FD 0.632)。ROC 分析表明,对于偏移量测量,读者 1 的前上位置曲线下面积最大(0.666),读者 2 的后上位置曲线下面积最大(0.612)。对于 FD 测量,两位读者的前上位置曲线下面积最大(0.793/0.798)。

结论

虽然 FD 测量优于偏移量测量,与 alpha 角的结果相似,但 FD 和偏移量测量均不是区分 FAI 伴凸轮畸形患者和无症状志愿者的可靠工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验