Suppr超能文献

根据受者年龄,扩展标准供者肾移植的不同结局。

Differential outcomes of expanded-criteria donor renal allografts according to recipient age.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792-7375, USA.

出版信息

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Jul;7(7):1163-71. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00150112. Epub 2012 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Expanded-criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are used to expand the number of deceased-donor kidney transplants, often for elderly recipients. This study sought to determine whether older recipients had significantly worse outcomes from receiving ECD kidneys and whether outcomes of ECD versus standard-criteria donor (SCD) kidneys differed in younger recipients.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This is a single-center, retrospective review of all primary deceased-donor kidney transplantations performed between 2000 and 2005. Group 1 consisted of patients ≥60 years of age (n=189) who received an ECD (n=96) or an SCD (n=93) kidney. Group 2 consisted of patients 40-59 years of age (n=370) who received an ECD (n=105) or an SCD (n=265) kidney.

RESULTS

Older recipients (group 1) who received ECD kidneys demonstrated significantly shortened 5-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates compared with older recipients of SCD allografts. Group 1 ECD recipients also had significantly worse outcomes than younger (group 2) ECD recipients. In multivariate analysis, ECD kidneys remained an independent predictor of poorer outcome in group 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity and mortality were increased in elderly recipients of ECD kidneys. These findings may have implications in kidney allocation policy developments that encourage placement of ECD kidneys for older recipients.

摘要

背景与目的

扩展标准供者(ECD)肾脏被用于增加已故供者肾脏移植的数量,通常用于老年受者。本研究旨在确定老年受者接受 ECD 肾脏是否会导致更差的结局,以及年轻受者中 ECD 与标准标准供者(SCD)肾脏的结局是否存在差异。

设计、地点、参与者和测量方法:这是一项对 2000 年至 2005 年间进行的所有原发性已故供者肾脏移植的单中心回顾性研究。第 1 组包括年龄≥60 岁的患者(n=189),他们接受了 ECD(n=96)或 SCD(n=93)肾脏移植。第 2 组包括年龄 40-59 岁的患者(n=370),他们接受了 ECD(n=105)或 SCD(n=265)肾脏移植。

结果

接受 ECD 肾脏的老年受者(第 1 组)与接受 SCD 同种异体肾脏的老年受者相比,5 年实际患者和移植物存活率明显缩短。第 1 组 ECD 受者的结局也明显差于年轻(第 2 组)ECD 受者。多变量分析显示,ECD 肾脏仍然是第 1 组不良结局的独立预测因素。

结论

ECD 肾脏会增加老年受者的发病率和死亡率。这些发现可能对肾脏分配政策的发展产生影响,鼓励为老年受者放置 ECD 肾脏。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Strategies for an Expanded Use of Kidneys From Elderly Donors.扩大使用老年供体肾脏的策略。
Transplantation. 2017 Apr;101(4):727-745. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001635.

本文引用的文献

1
A piece of my mind. The perfect match.肺腑之言。完美匹配。
JAMA. 2011 Nov 23;306(20):2197-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1710.
2
Delayed graft function in the kidney transplant.移植肾延迟功能恢复。
Am J Transplant. 2011 Nov;11(11):2279-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03754.x. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
3
Risk, prognosis, and unintended consequences in kidney allocation.肾脏分配中的风险、预后及意外后果。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1285-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1102583. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
4
Improving the allocation system for deceased-donor kidneys.改善死体供肾分配系统。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1287-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1102728. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
5
Moving kidney allocation forward: the ASTS perspective.推进肾脏分配:美国移植外科医师学会的观点。
Am J Transplant. 2009 Jul;9(7):1501-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02697.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验