• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国肺癌筛查试验所采用的招募方法。

Recruitment methods employed in the National Lung Screening Trial.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Med Screen. 2012 Jun;19(2):94-102. doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012016. Epub 2012 May 31.

DOI:10.1258/jms.2012.012016
PMID:22653572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3641889/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To report participant recruitment experiences in a large, US randomized controlled trial (RCT) of lung cancer screening, with the aim of providing information that may be of use to researchers who wish to conduct similar future studies.

SETTING

The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), an RCT that demonstrated a 20% lung cancer mortality reduction with low dose helical computed tomography screening, relative to single-view chest radiograph screening. Thirty-three US medical centres recruited 53,454 participants from August 2002 through April 2004.

METHODS

After recruitment was completed, centre co-ordinators were asked to complete a questionnaire addressing the extent to which specific methods were used and, for each specific method, numbers enrolled and total cost of the effort. Cost per enrollee was calculated. Co-ordinators also were asked to report lessons learned.

RESULTS

Twenty-two centres returned questionnaires. Use of recruitment method varied by centre. Among centres reporting number enrolled by method, about 19,000 participants were enrolled with direct mail, about 4200 with mass media, and about 1000 with community outreach. Cost per enrollee varied across centres but medians were (US) $101 (direct mail), $79 (mass media), and $4 (community outreach). Co-ordinators reported that it was important to know where to find persons likely to be eligible and interested, and how best to approach them.

CONCLUSIONS

Most NLST participants were recruited through direct mail, although median cost per participant was highest for that method.

摘要

目的

报告在美国一项大型肺癌筛查随机对照试验(RCT)中的参与者招募经验,旨在为希望开展类似未来研究的研究人员提供有用的信息。

背景

国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST)是一项 RCT,与单视图胸部 X 线筛查相比,低剂量螺旋 CT 筛查可使肺癌死亡率降低 20%。33 个美国医疗中心于 2002 年 8 月至 2004 年 4 月期间招募了 53454 名参与者。

方法

招募完成后,中心协调员被要求填写一份问卷,内容涉及特定方法的使用程度,以及每种特定方法的入组人数和招募工作的总费用。计算了每位入组者的费用。协调员还被要求报告所吸取的经验教训。

结果

22 个中心返回了问卷。各中心的招募方法各不相同。在报告按方法入组人数的中心中,大约有 19000 名参与者通过直邮入组,大约有 4200 名参与者通过大众媒体入组,大约有 1000 名参与者通过社区外展入组。各中心的每位入组者费用不同,但中位数分别为 101 美元(直邮)、79 美元(大众媒体)和 4 美元(社区外展)。协调员报告说,了解在哪里可以找到可能符合条件和有兴趣的人,以及如何最好地接触他们是很重要的。

结论

大多数 NLST 参与者是通过直邮招募的,尽管每位参与者的平均费用最高。

相似文献

1
Recruitment methods employed in the National Lung Screening Trial.全国肺癌筛查试验所采用的招募方法。
J Med Screen. 2012 Jun;19(2):94-102. doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012016. Epub 2012 May 31.
2
Recruitment methods employed in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.前列腺、肺、结肠直肠癌和卵巢癌筛查试验中采用的招募方法。
Clin Trials. 2009 Feb;6(1):52-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774508100974.
3
Comparing Lung Cancer Screening Strategies in a Nationally Representative US Population Using Transportability Methods for the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial.使用国家肺癌筛查试验的可转移性方法对美国代表性人群进行肺癌筛查策略比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2346295. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46295.
4
Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial.随机国家肺癌筛查试验中参与者的基线特征。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Dec 1;102(23):1771-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq434. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
5
Impact and costs of targeted recruitment of minorities to the National Lung Screening Trial.少数民族参与国家肺癌筛查试验的靶向招募的影响和成本。
Clin Trials. 2011 Apr;8(2):214-23. doi: 10.1177/1740774510396742. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The UK Lung Cancer Screening Trial: a pilot randomised controlled trial of low-dose computed tomography screening for the early detection of lung cancer.英国肺癌筛查试验:一项关于低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查早期肺癌的试点随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 May;20(40):1-146. doi: 10.3310/hta20400.
8
Lung cancer incidence and mortality in National Lung Screening Trial participants who underwent low-dose CT prevalence screening: a retrospective cohort analysis of a randomised, multicentre, diagnostic screening trial.接受低剂量CT筛查的国家肺癌筛查试验参与者的肺癌发病率和死亡率:一项随机、多中心诊断性筛查试验的回顾性队列分析
Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):590-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00621-X. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
9
Effective dose assessment for participants in the National Lung Screening Trial undergoing posteroanterior chest radiographic examinations.对接受前后位胸部 X 射线摄影检查的全国肺癌筛查试验参与者进行有效剂量评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jul;201(1):142-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9181.
10
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.

引用本文的文献

1
A collection of multiregistry data on patients at high risk of lung cancer-a Danish retrospective cohort study of nearly 40,000 patients.一项关于肺癌高危患者的多登记处数据收集——一项对近40000名患者的丹麦回顾性队列研究。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 26;12(12):2392-2411. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-495. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
2
Optimising recruitment to a lung cancer screening trial: A comparison of general practitioner and community-based recruitment.优化肺癌筛查试验的招募工作:全科医生与社区招募方式的比较
J Med Screen. 2024 Mar;31(1):46-52. doi: 10.1177/09691413231190785. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
3
Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature.理解患者接受低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:对当前文献的混合方法范围综述。
Respir Res. 2022 Dec 23;23(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02255-8.
4
Implementation planning for lung cancer screening in China.中国肺癌筛查的实施规划。
Precis Clin Med. 2019 Mar;2(1):13-44. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbz002. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
5
Cost analysis and efficacy of recruitment strategies used in a large pragmatic community-based clinical trial targeting low-income seniors: a comparative descriptive analysis.针对低收入老年人的大型实用社区临床试验中使用的招募策略的成本分析和效果:比较描述性分析。
Trials. 2019 Oct 7;20(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3652-5.
6
The Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT): protocol for a randomised controlled demonstration lung cancer screening pilot testing a targeted invitation strategy for high risk and 'hard-to-reach' patients.肺部筛查纳入试验(LSUT):一项随机对照示范性肺癌筛查试验方案,用于测试针对高危和“难以接触到”患者的定向邀请策略。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Apr 20;16:281. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2316-z.
7
Challenges in recruitment to a randomized controlled study of cardiovascular disease reduction in sleep apnea: an analysis of alternative strategies.睡眠呼吸暂停患者心血管疾病减少的随机对照研究的招募挑战:替代策略分析
Sleep. 2014 Dec 1;37(12):2035-8. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4266.

本文引用的文献

1
The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design.国家肺癌筛查试验:概述与研究设计。
Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):243-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091808. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
2
Recruitment methods employed in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.前列腺、肺、结肠直肠癌和卵巢癌筛查试验中采用的招募方法。
Clin Trials. 2009 Feb;6(1):52-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774508100974.
3
Design, recruitment and baseline results of the ITALUNG trial for lung cancer screening with low-dose CT.ITALUNG低剂量CT肺癌筛查试验的设计、招募及基线结果
Lung Cancer. 2009 Apr;64(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.07.003. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
4
Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON).筛查试验中基于风险从普通人群中进行选择:荷兰 - 比利时随机肺癌多层CT筛查试验(NELSON)的选择标准、招募及效能
Int J Cancer. 2007 Feb 15;120(4):868-74. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22134.
5
Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph: the Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute.螺旋CT扫描与胸部X光片用于肺癌筛查的随机可行性试验的基线研究结果:美国国立癌症研究所肺癌筛查研究
Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1):114-21. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.1.114.
6
Randomized controlled trial with low-dose spiral CT for lung cancer screening: feasibility study and preliminary results.低剂量螺旋CT用于肺癌筛查的随机对照试验:可行性研究及初步结果
Radiology. 2002 Nov;225(2):506-10. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2252011851.
7
Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening.早期肺癌行动项目:基线筛查的总体设计与结果
Lancet. 1999 Jul 10;354(9173):99-105. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06093-6.
8
Strategies for recruitment to a population-based lung cancer prevention trial: the CARET experience with heavy smokers. Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial.基于人群的肺癌预防试验的招募策略:重度吸烟者的CARET经验。β-胡萝卜素与视黄醇功效试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998 May;7(5):405-12.
9
Research cost analyses to aid in decision making in the conduct of a large prevention trial, CARET. Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial.
Control Clin Trials. 1993 Aug;14(4):325-39. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(93)90229-7.