Rittig M, Brigel C, Lütjen-Drecoll E
Anatomisches Institut, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Federal Republic of Germany.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1990;228(6):528-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00918485.
The anterior segment of the human eye was screened for differences in the lectin-binding patterns of Con A, PNA, GS-I, WGA, SBA, DBA, and UEA-I to enable cell typing for cell-culture purposes. An immunohistochemical technique combining an indirect antibody-lectin method with the avidin-biotin system was used. Con A and WGA were bound by all cells except the conjunctival goblet cells. UEA-I was exclusively bound by both vascular endothelial cells and some corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells. The binding of GS-I, PNA, SBA, and DBA showed an uneven pattern and differed among the cases investigated. The reasons for these differences are not clear. Our results indicate that the usefulness of lectins for cell-typing purposes is restricted and must be determined for every case.
对人眼前节进行筛查,以检测伴菌凝集素(Con A)、花生凝集素(PNA)、荆豆凝集素I(GS-I)、小麦胚凝集素(WGA)、大豆凝集素(SBA)、双花扁豆凝集素(DBA)和荆豆凝集素I(UEA-I)凝集素结合模式的差异,以便为细胞培养目的进行细胞分型。采用了一种将间接抗体-凝集素方法与抗生物素蛋白-生物素系统相结合的免疫组织化学技术。除结膜杯状细胞外,所有细胞均与Con A和WGA结合。UEA-I仅与血管内皮细胞以及一些角膜和结膜上皮细胞结合。GS-I、PNA、SBA和DBA的结合呈现出不均匀的模式,且在所研究的病例中有所不同。这些差异的原因尚不清楚。我们的结果表明,凝集素用于细胞分型的实用性有限,必须针对每个病例进行确定。