Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Nutrition. 2012 Oct;28(10):1008-11. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 May 31.
The use of continuous intravenous regular human insulin (RHI) infusion is often necessary to achieve glycemic control in critically ill patients. Because insulin is a high-risk medication owing to the potential for severe hypoglycemia, it is imperative that insulin infusion algorithms are designed to be safe, effective, and instructionally clear. The safety and efficacy of our intravenous RHI infusion algorithm protocol has been previously established (Nutrition 2008;24:536-45); however, the protocol violations by nursing personnel were not examined. The objective of this study was to assess nursing adherence to our RHI infusion algorithm.
Continuous RHI infusion algorithm violations were retrospectively evaluated in adult patients admitted to a trauma intensive care unit who received concurrent continuous enteral and/or parenteral nutrition therapy and our algorithm for at least 3 d. Blood glucose (BG) monitoring was done every 1 to 2 h with the target BG at 70 to 149 mg/dL (3.9 to 8.3 mmol/L). Nursing adherence to the RHI infusion protocol was evaluated for each patient by comparing the adjustments in insulin infusion rates documented by the nursing personnel with the prescribed adjustments per our graduated continuous intravenous RHI infusion algorithm.
A total of 4150 BG measurements necessitating the determination of the appropriate RHI dosage rate by nursing personnel in 40 patients occurred during the observational period. The target BG was achieved for a mean of 20 h/d and none of the patients had an episode of severe hypoglycemia (BG <40 mg/dL or 2.2 mmol/L). The overall rate of algorithm violations was 12.1%. The algorithm violations accounted for a single episode of mild to moderate hypoglycemia (BG 40 to 60 mg/dL or 2.2 to 3.3 mmol/L) in 4 patients and 65 total episodes of hyperglycemia (BG ≥150 mg/dL or 8.3 mmol/L) in 18 patients.
An adherence rate of nearly 90% is indicative of excellent nursing adherence compared with other published paper-based algorithms that examined protocol adherence. These data, combined with our previously published glycemic control data, indicate that this RHI infusion algorithm is an effective one for hyperglycemic trauma patients receiving continuous enteral and/or parenteral nutritional therapy.
在危重症患者中,常需要持续静脉输注常规人胰岛素(RHI)来实现血糖控制。由于胰岛素存在严重低血糖的潜在风险,因此输注算法必须安全、有效且易于操作。我们的静脉内 RHI 输注算法方案的安全性和有效性已得到先前的验证(《营养》2008 年;24:536-45);然而,并未检查护理人员对该方案的违反情况。本研究的目的是评估护理人员对我们的 RHI 输注算法的遵守情况。
回顾性评估了在创伤重症监护病房接受持续肠内和/或肠外营养治疗且至少使用我们的 RHI 输注算法 3 天的成年患者的连续 RHI 输注算法违规情况。每 1 至 2 小时监测一次血糖(BG),目标 BG 为 70 至 149mg/dL(3.9 至 8.3mmol/L)。通过比较护理人员记录的胰岛素输注率调整与我们的分级连续静脉内 RHI 输注算法规定的调整,评估每位患者对 RHI 输注方案的依从性。
在观察期间,共 40 名患者的 4150 次 BG 测量需要护理人员确定适当的 RHI 剂量率。目标 BG 平均达到 20 小时/天,且无患者发生严重低血糖(BG<40mg/dL 或 2.2mmol/L)。总体算法违规率为 12.1%。算法违规导致 4 名患者出现 1 次轻度至中度低血糖(BG40 至 60mg/dL 或 2.2 至 3.3mmol/L)和 18 名患者共发生 65 次高血糖(BG≥150mg/dL 或 8.3mmol/L)。
与其他检查方案依从性的已发表纸质算法相比,近 90%的依从率表明护理人员具有出色的依从性。这些数据与我们之前发表的血糖控制数据相结合,表明该 RHI 输注算法对接受持续肠内和/或肠外营养治疗的高血糖创伤患者是有效的。