Cyrus Rachel M, Szumita Paul M, Greenwood Bonnie C, Pendergrass Merri L
Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Administration; L-2, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Sep;43(9):1413-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M060. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
Hyperglycemia is common in critically ill patients and is an independent risk factor for in-hospital morbidity and mortality.
To assess compliance with a paper-based, multiplication-factor, intravenous insulin protocol.
A retrospective chart review was conducted in a 720-bed urban, academic medical center in Boston, Massachusetts. During a 1-month period, compliance with and the consequent safety and efficacy of the Brigham and Women's Hospital paper-based, multiplication-factor, intravenous insulin protocol was evaluated.
The primary endpoint of protocol compliance, defined as correct adjustment to insulin infusion rate and correct timing of bedside blood glucose concentration (BBGC) checks +/-10 minutes of prespecified BBGC check according to the Brigham and Women's Hospital Intravenous Insulin Protocol (BHIP), was 47.2%. Seventy-two patients met inclusion criteria. Appropriate adjustment of infusion rates occurred 68.2% (1206/1768) of the time. Compliance with the timing of BBGC checks was found to be the majority of protocol violations. BBGCs were monitored +/-5 minutes of indicated time per the protocol 26.2% (463/1768) of the time. Blood glucose concentration checks within extended timing of +/-10 minutes of indicated time per the protocol occurred 793 (44.8%) times. Blood glucose concentration monitoring took place greater than 20 minutes past indicated time 450 (25.5%) times. In 1768 measurements, blood glucose concentrations between 40 and 60 mg/dL occurred 23 (1.3%) times in 12 (16.7%) patients. Blood glucose concentrations 40 mg/dL or less were detected 3 (0.17%) times in 2 (2.7%) patients. None of these hypoglycemic events led to documented complications.
Overall, a rather low level of compliance with a paper-based, multiplication-factor, intravenous insulin protocol was observed, which warrants further investigation. Compliance rates in this evaluation were found to be similar to the rates observed in previously evaluated fixed-dose intravenous insulin protocols. Protocol noncompliance may be associated with hypo- and hyperglycemia.
高血糖在危重症患者中很常见,是院内发病和死亡的独立危险因素。
评估对纸质乘法因子静脉胰岛素方案的依从性。
在马萨诸塞州波士顿一家拥有720张床位的城市学术医疗中心进行回顾性病历审查。在1个月期间,评估对布莱根妇女医院纸质乘法因子静脉胰岛素方案的依从性及其安全性和有效性。
方案依从性的主要终点定义为根据布莱根妇女医院静脉胰岛素方案(BHIP)正确调整胰岛素输注速率以及在预定床边血糖浓度(BBGC)检查时间的±10分钟内正确进行床边血糖浓度检查,为47.2%。72名患者符合纳入标准。输注速率的适当调整发生在68.2%(1206/1768)的时间。发现对BBGC检查时间的依从性是方案违规的主要原因。根据方案,在指示时间的±5分钟内监测BBGC的时间为26.2%(463/1768)。在指示时间的±10分钟延长时间内进行血糖浓度检查的次数为793次(44.8%)。血糖浓度监测在指示时间后超过20分钟进行的次数为450次(25.5%)。在1768次测量中,血糖浓度在40至60mg/dL之间的情况在12名(16.7%)患者中出现了23次(1.3%)。血糖浓度在40mg/dL或更低的情况在2名(2.7%)患者中检测到3次(0.17%)。这些低血糖事件均未导致有记录的并发症。
总体而言,观察到对纸质乘法因子静脉胰岛素方案的依从性相当低,这值得进一步研究。本次评估中的依从率与先前评估的固定剂量静脉胰岛素方案中观察到的率相似。方案不依从可能与低血糖和高血糖有关。