Suppr超能文献

无错学习可改善后天性脑损伤儿童的记忆表现:标准与自我生成技术的对照研究

Errorless learning improves memory performance in children with acquired brain injury: a controlled comparison of standard and self-generation techniques.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;22(5):697-715. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2012.686820. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

Abstract

The principle of errorless learning has proven efficacy in helping adults and older adults with acquired memory impairment learn novel information. However, surprisingly few studies have investigated its efficacy in children. The present study addresses this omission in the literature, investigating the effectiveness of two forms of errorless learning - the established method, in which the examiner provides responses during learning, and a self-generation method, in which learners produce their own responses - each relative to the standard baseline of trial-and-error learning, in young people with acquired brain injury (ABI, n = 15) and non-injured controls (n = 15). Participants learned different word lists in each condition and their memory was tested after distraction and, subsequently, after a 20-minute delay. Not surprisingly, controls performed better than the ABI group. However, while there was no effect of learning condition for controls, in the ABI group memory performance was significantly better under errorless conditions. In contrast to findings in the adult literature, there was no difference in the efficacy of the two errorless methods, suggesting that self-generation was no better than standard examiner-generation. This study extends upon previous research to provide the first demonstration of the effectiveness of errorless methods in a group of young people with ABI.

摘要

无错误学习原则已被证明在帮助成年人和老年人群体改善获得性记忆损伤方面具有显著效果。然而,令人惊讶的是,很少有研究调查它在儿童中的效果。本研究填补了这一文献空白,调查了两种无错误学习形式的有效性——一种是经过验证的方法,在这种方法中,检查者在学习过程中提供答案;另一种是自我生成方法,在这种方法中,学习者自己生成答案——与传统的试错学习基线相比,在后天脑损伤(ABI)的年轻人(n=15)和未受伤的对照组(n=15)中进行了比较。参与者在每种条件下学习不同的单词列表,并在分心后和 20 分钟的延迟后测试他们的记忆。不出所料,对照组的表现优于 ABI 组。然而,对于对照组来说,学习条件没有影响,但在 ABI 组中,无错误条件下的记忆表现明显更好。与成人文献中的发现相反,两种无错误方法的效果没有差异,这表明自我生成并不比标准的检查者生成更好。这项研究扩展了以前的研究,首次证明了无错误方法在一组后天脑损伤的年轻人中的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验