Suppr超能文献

支气管内超声引导下细针穿刺活检与经颈纵隔镜检查在非小细胞肺癌淋巴结分期中的应用:一项前瞻性对比研究

Endobronchial ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration versus transcervical mediastinoscopy in nodal staging of non small cell lung cancer: a prospective comparison study.

作者信息

Zhang Ruoyu, Mietchen Christina, Krüger Marcus, Wiegmann Bettina, Golpon Heiko, Dettmer Sabine, Haverich Axel, Zardo Patrick

机构信息

Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str, 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jun 6;7:51. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-7-51.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

At present only few studies directly compare the diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) and transcervical video-assisted mediastinoscopy (TM) for mediastinal lymph node staging in patients with NSCLC. If and when EBUS-FNA may replace TM as Gold Standard remains controversial.

METHODS

From April 2008 to December 2009, 36 patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy underwent simultaneous EBUS-FNA/ TM at our institution. Among them were 26 patients with confirmed or suspected NSCLC.

RESULTS

A total of 133 samples were obtained by EBUS-FNA and 157 samples by TM. EBUS-FNA achieved significantly less conclusive, but more indeterminate pathological results in comparison to TM (78.7% vs. 98.6%, p < 0.001; 14.9% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.007). Less paratracheal nodes were sampled by EBUS-FNA (right: 46.2% vs. 88.5%, p = 0.003; left: 23.1% vs. 65.4%, p = 0.005), while sampling rates in the subcarinal localisation were comparable (96.2% vs. 80.8%, p = NS). Among patients with confirmed NSCLC and conclusive EBUS-FNA/ TM findings (n = 18), the prevalence of N2/N3 disease was 66.7% (n = 12) according to TM findings. Diverging nodal stages were found in five patients (27.8%). Three patients who were N2 negative in EBUS-FNA were upstaged to N2 or N3 by TM, two patients with N2 status in EBUS-FNA were upstaged to N3 by TM.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to TM, EBUS-FNA had a lower diagnostic yield and resulted in systematic mediastinal nodal understaging. At this point we suggest corroborating negative EBUS-FNA results by transcervical mediastinoscopy.

摘要

背景

目前仅有少数研究直接比较了超声支气管镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EBUS-FNA)与经颈电视辅助纵隔镜检查(TM)对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者纵隔淋巴结分期的诊断效能。EBUS-FNA是否以及何时能够取代TM成为金标准仍存在争议。

方法

2008年4月至2009年12月,36例纵隔淋巴结肿大患者在我院同时接受了EBUS-FNA/TM检查。其中26例为确诊或疑似NSCLC患者。

结果

EBUS-FNA共获取133份样本,TM共获取157份样本。与TM相比,EBUS-FNA获得的明确病理结果显著较少,但不确定病理结果较多(78.7%对98.6%,p<0.001;14.9%对1.4%,p=0.007)。EBUS-FNA对气管旁淋巴结的取材较少(右侧:46.2%对88.5%,p=0.003;左侧:23.1%对65.4%,p=0.005),而隆突下部位的取材率相当(96.2%对80.8%,p=无统计学意义)。在确诊为NSCLC且EBUS-FNA/TM检查结果明确的患者中(n=18),根据TM检查结果,N2/N3期疾病的患病率为66.7%(n=12)。5例患者(27.8%)发现分期不同。3例EBUS-FNA检查为N2阴性的患者经TM检查上调至N2或N3期,2例EBUS-FNA检查为N2期的患者经TM检查上调至N3期。

结论

与TM相比,EBUS-FNA的诊断效能较低,导致纵隔淋巴结分期系统性偏低。目前我们建议通过经颈纵隔镜检查来证实EBUS-FNA的阴性结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6e4/3408361/4e2504949509/1749-8090-7-51-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验