Suppr超能文献

纵隔镜检查:仍是金标准。

Mediastinoscopy: still the gold standard.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jun;89(6):S2084-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.098.

Abstract

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS-TBNA) is emerging as an alternative to mediastinoscopy for mediastinal lymph node evaluation in non-small cell lung cancer. It remains controversial whether EBUS-TBNA is as accurate as mediastinoscopy. Sensitivity appears similar to mediastinoscopy with enlarged nodes, but lower with normal-sized nodes. The false negative rate appears higher than with mediastinoscopy, so nonmalignant EBUS results may be unreliable. Two flawed studies examining costs identify a very small cost benefit to EBUS, which we will question herein. There are scenarios in which EBUS is preferable to mediastinoscopy. However, for routine staging of the upper mediastinum in non-small cell lung cancer, the benefits of EBUS over mediastinoscopy remain unproven.

摘要

经支气管超声内镜检查(EBUS-TBNA)作为纵隔镜检查的一种替代方法,正在逐渐应用于非小细胞肺癌的纵隔淋巴结评估。EBUS-TBNA 的准确性是否与纵隔镜检查相当仍存在争议。对于肿大的淋巴结,EBUS-TBNA 的敏感性与纵隔镜检查相似,但对于正常大小的淋巴结,其敏感性较低。EBUS-TBNA 的假阴性率似乎高于纵隔镜检查,因此非恶性的 EBUS 结果可能不可靠。两项研究检查了成本效益,发现 EBUS 仅具有很小的成本效益,我们将在此提出质疑。在某些情况下,EBUS 优于纵隔镜检查。然而,对于非小细胞肺癌的上纵隔常规分期,EBUS 优于纵隔镜检查的益处尚未得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验