Suppr超能文献

内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检术与支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术:在非小细胞肺癌纵隔分期中,两者联合是否优于单一方法?

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: Are two better than one in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer?

作者信息

Oki Masahide, Saka Hideo, Ando Masahiko, Kitagawa Chiyoe, Kogure Yoshihito, Seki Yukio

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;148(4):1169-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.023. Epub 2014 May 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The role of combined endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with a single bronchoscope is poorly understood. The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the roles of EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA with a single bronchoscope in the preoperative hilar and mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A total of 150 patients with potentially resectable known or suspected NSCLC were enrolled in our prospective study. EBUS-TBNA was performed, followed by EUS-FNA, with an EBUS bronchoscope for N2 and N3 nodes≥5 mm in the shortest diameter on ultrasound images, in a single session.

RESULTS

EBUS-TBNA was performed for 257 lymph nodes and EUS-FNA for 176 lymph nodes. Of the 150 patients, 146 had a final diagnosis of NSCLC. Of these 146 patients, 33 (23%) had N2 and/or N3 nodal metastases. The sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA, EUS-FNA, and the combined approach per patient was 52%, 45%, and 73%, respectively (EBUS-TBNA vs the combined approach, P=.016, McNemar's test). The corresponding negative predictive value was 88%, 86%, and 93%. Two patients (1%) developed severe cough from EBUS-TBNA.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined endoscopic approach with EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA is a safe and accurate method for preoperative hilar and mediastinal staging of NSCLC, with better results than with each technique by itself.

摘要

目的

对于使用单一支气管镜进行支气管内超声引导针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)和内镜超声引导细针穿刺活检术(EUS-FNA)的联合应用,人们了解甚少。本研究的目的是阐明使用单一支气管镜进行EBUS-TBNA和EUS-FNA在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)术前肺门及纵隔分期中的作用。

方法

共有150例已知或疑似可切除的NSCLC患者纳入我们的前瞻性研究。使用EBUS支气管镜对超声图像上最短直径≥5mm的N2和N3淋巴结在同一手术中先进行EBUS-TBNA,随后进行EUS-FNA。

结果

共对257个淋巴结进行了EBUS-TBNA,对176个淋巴结进行了EUS-FNA。150例患者中,146例最终诊断为NSCLC。在这146例患者中,33例(23%)有N2和/或N3淋巴结转移。EBUS-TBNA、EUS-FNA及联合方法对每位患者的敏感性分别为52%、45%和73%(EBUS-TBNA与联合方法比较,P = 0.016,McNemar检验)。相应的阴性预测值分别为88%、86%和93%。2例患者(1%)因EBUS-TBNA出现严重咳嗽。

结论

EBUS-TBNA和EUS-FNA联合内镜检查方法是NSCLC术前肺门及纵隔分期的一种安全、准确的方法,其结果优于单独使用每种技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验