Division of Oral Diagnosis, Department of Oral Medicine and Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Seiryo-machi 4-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Arch Oral Biol. 2012 Aug;57(8):1121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
Minor salivary gland flow rate (MF) has been proposed as a key feature of xerostomia (subjective feeling of dry mouth). To assess its diagnostic performance, MF was compared in xerostomia and control subjects.
Sixty-six subjects with xerostomia and 30 controls were enrolled. MF was measured in the lower labial mucosa using the iodine-starch filter paper method. Stimulated whole salivary flow rates were also measured using the gum test (stimulated-WF).
Both labial-MF and stimulated-WF were significantly lower in xerostomia subjects than in controls. There was a positive correlation between labial-MF and stimulated-WF in control but not xerostomia subjects. In xerostomia subjects compared to controls, there was a significantly larger reduction in labial-MF than in stimulated-WF. Xerostomia was most accurately diagnosed using a labial-MF cutoff value of 0.25 μL/cm(2)/min. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy at this cutoff value were 1.00, 0.87, 0.93, 1.00, and 0.96, respectively. Compared to respective values of 0.64, 1.00, 1.00, 0.56, and 0.75 for stimulated-WF at the traditional cutoff of 1.0 mL/min, these data indicate the higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of labial-MF.
Xerostomia was more strongly related to reduction of labial-MF than to that of stimulated-WF. Xerostomia was most likely triggered at a labial-MF cut-off value of 0.25 μL/cm(2)/min based on results from the iodine-starch method.
小唾液腺流量(MF)被认为是口干(主观感觉干燥)的关键特征。为了评估其诊断性能,我们比较了口干症患者和对照组的 MF。
共纳入 66 例口干症患者和 30 例对照者。使用碘淀粉滤纸法在下唇黏膜测量 MF。使用口香糖试验(刺激-WF)测量刺激全唾液流速。
口干症患者的唇 MF 和刺激-WF 均明显低于对照组。在对照组中唇 MF 与刺激-WF 呈正相关,但在口干症患者中无相关性。与对照组相比,口干症患者唇 MF 的下降幅度明显大于刺激-WF。使用唇 MF 截断值 0.25 μL/cm(2)/min 对口干症的诊断最为准确。该截断值的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确性分别为 1.00、0.87、0.93、1.00 和 0.96。与刺激-WF 的传统截断值 1.0 mL/min 的相应值 0.64、1.00、1.00、0.56 和 0.75 相比,这些数据表明唇 MF 的敏感性、阴性预测值和诊断准确性更高。
口干症与唇 MF 的降低更为密切相关,而与刺激-WF 的降低相关性较低。根据碘淀粉法的结果,口干症最有可能在唇 MF 截断值为 0.25 μL/cm(2)/min 时被触发。