Suppr超能文献

血糖波动对心血管结局的影响超出糖化血红蛋白。证据和临床观点。

Impact of glycemic variability on cardiovascular outcomes beyond glycated hemoglobin. Evidence and clinical perspectives.

机构信息

University of Rome Tor Vergata-Fatebenefratelli Hospital, AFAR, Italy.

出版信息

Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Sep;22(9):691-6. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Jun 4.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this review is to focus on intra-day glucose variability (GV), specifically reviewing its correlation with HbA1c, the methods currently available to measure it, and finally the relationship between GV and cardiovascular outcomes, in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, and in the non-diabetic population.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The term GV has been used in the literature to express many different concepts; in the present review, we focus our attention on intra-day GV. In particular, we try to assess whether GV provides additional information on glycemic control beyond HbA1c, since GV seems to be incompletely expressed by HbA1c, particularly in patients with good metabolic control. Many different indexes have been proposed to measure GV, however at the moment no "gold standard" procedure is available. Evidence in vitro, in experimental settings and in animal studies, shows that fluctuating glucose levels display a more deleterious effect than constantly high glucose exposure. However, these findings are not completely reproducible in human settings. Moreover, the relationship between GV and cardiovascular events is still controversial.

CONCLUSIONS

The term GV should be reserved to indicate intra-day variability and different indexes of GV should be used, depending on the metabolic profile of the population studied and the specific issue to be investigated. Self glucose monitoring or continuous glucose monitoring should be used for assessing glucose variability.

摘要

目的

本综述的目的在于重点关注日内血糖变异性(GV),具体探讨其与 HbA1c 的相关性、目前用于测量 GV 的方法,以及 GV 与 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者及非糖尿病人群中心血管结局之间的关系。

数据综合

文献中使用了“GV”一词来表达许多不同的概念;在本综述中,我们将注意力集中在日内 GV 上。特别是,我们试图评估 GV 是否在 HbA1c 之外提供了关于血糖控制的额外信息,因为 GV 似乎不能完全由 HbA1c 来表达,尤其是在代谢控制良好的患者中。已经提出了许多不同的指标来测量 GV,但目前尚无“金标准”程序。体外、实验和动物研究的证据表明,波动的血糖水平比持续高血糖暴露具有更具危害性的影响。然而,这些发现并不能完全在人体环境中重现。此外,GV 与心血管事件之间的关系仍存在争议。

结论

“GV”一词应保留用于表示日内变异性,并且应根据所研究人群的代谢特征和要研究的具体问题使用不同的 GV 指标。自我血糖监测或连续血糖监测可用于评估血糖变异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验