Suppr超能文献

[营养正常儿童腹泻性脱水的静脉补液:对哥伦比亚医学院校提供的方案的调查]

[Intravenous rehydration for diarrheal dehydration of eutrophic children: survey of protocols provided at Colombian medical schools].

作者信息

Flórez Iván Darío, Ramos Esteban, Bernal Carlos, Cuéllar Olga Juliana, Cornejo José William

机构信息

Grupo de Investigación en Enfermedades del Niño y el Adolescente, Departamento de Pediatría y Puericultura, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

出版信息

Biomedica. 2011 Jul-Sep;31(3):392-402. doi: 10.1590/S0120-41572011000300011.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In all cases of severe dehydration from diarrhea, WHO recommends rapid rehydration. If oral rehydration in children is contraindicated, intravenous rehydration is recommended for immediate administration. However, methods of intravenous rehydration appear to be inadequately addressed in the medical schools of Colombia.

OBJECTIVE

Current approaches to oral rehydration were summarized, and instructors were informed concerning current WHO recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey was designed for pediatric instructors in Colombian medical schools. Direct questions about rehydration methods were included as well as presentation of theoretical clinical situations with dehydrated children. The survey also asked for the conditions necessary for intravenous rehydration and method of administration (volume, solution, concentration and speed of infusion).

RESULTS

Forty-one surveys were included (82% of medical schools in Colombia). Inadequate contraindications for oral rehydration therapy were made in 41%. Rapid and slow intravenous rehydration was recommended in 71% and 29%, respectively; 57% recommended fluid bolus to rehydrate. Adequate volumes were recommended by less than half of the respondents and adequate sodium concentration was recommended by 85%. In 56% of medical schools, glucose was not included in solutions and 66% use Ringer lactate. Normal saline solution, dextrose solution with electrolytes and polyelectrolytes solutions are also used.

CONCLUSIONS

Misconceptions are common concerning the contraindications to oral rehydration therapy. One-third of medical schools promote a slow therapy despite the superiority of the rapid therapy. Uniformity for rapid therapy schemes is lacking. Bolus rehydration is commonly advocated despite the fact that this method is unsupported by the literature. Concepts about rehydration must be updated in medical schools and a national guide for intravenous rehydration is recommended.

摘要

引言

对于所有因腹泻导致严重脱水的病例,世界卫生组织建议进行快速补液。如果儿童口服补液存在禁忌,则建议立即进行静脉补液。然而,哥伦比亚医学院似乎未充分探讨静脉补液的方法。

目的

总结当前口服补液的方法,并告知教员世界卫生组织的当前建议。

材料与方法

为哥伦比亚医学院的儿科教员设计了一项调查。调查中包含了关于补液方法的直接问题,以及呈现脱水儿童的理论临床情况。调查还询问了静脉补液所需的条件以及给药方法(输液量、溶液、浓度和速度)。

结果

共纳入41份调查问卷(占哥伦比亚医学院校的82%)。41%的人对口服补液疗法的禁忌情况判断不当。分别有71%和29%的人建议快速和缓慢静脉补液;57%的人建议进行液体冲击疗法以补液。不到一半的受访者建议了足够的补液量,85%的人建议了合适的钠浓度。在56%的医学院校中,溶液中未包含葡萄糖,66%的人使用乳酸林格液。也使用生理盐水溶液、含电解质的葡萄糖溶液和多电解质溶液。

结论

对于口服补液疗法的禁忌存在常见误解。尽管快速疗法更具优势,但三分之一的医学院校仍提倡缓慢疗法。缺乏快速疗法方案的一致性。尽管文献并未支持这种方法,但仍普遍提倡冲击补液。医学院校关于补液的观念必须更新,建议制定全国性的静脉补液指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验