Loría A, Salas R
Depto. de Control de Calidad Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición, Salvador Zubirán.
Rev Invest Clin. 1990 Apr-Jun;42(2):157-60.
To evaluate the precision and accuracy of the liquid dispensers being used in our institution.
A total of 15 dispensers (8 micro and 7 macro) of automatic, semiautomatic or manual types were evaluated. They had been in use from 0.5 to 7 years.
The volume dispensed was established by gravimetry using an analytical balance (Chio JP-160) and deionized distilled water as previously described. The microdispensers were evaluated using volumes of 20 and 100 microL, and the macrodispensers with 1 and 5 mL. Each dispenser was evaluated using 10 replicates: the mean and the CV (coefficient of variation) were calculated with the 10 replicates. The mean was transformed to per cent of the theoretical volume. Thus a 100% ratio of accuracy corresponds to a perfect accuracy. An important methodological aspect was that the 10 dispensing replicates were performed personally by the habitual user of the dispenser.
The mean and CV are shown in table 2 for the microdispensers, and in table 3 for the macrodispenser. In the total 25 evaluation in tables 2 and 3 there were 8 instances in which precision was poor (CV above 3%) and also 8 cases of sizable inaccuracy (ratio outside of 100 +/- 5%). In 4 (2 micro and 2 macro) of these 8 inaccuracies, the error ranged from 10% to 22%. A minority was within the specifications of precision and accuracy claimed by the manufacturers of the dispensers with the exception of the manual microdispensers which were within specifications in most instances. We attribute the latter to the lack of a mechanical device in the manual dispensers.
As in a previous evaluation of automatic micropipettes, we detected a high proportion of pipetting systems out of specifications in both precision and accuracy. The magnitude of error in the accuracy of 4 dispensers (10 to 22%) would be catastrophic in methods demanding good pipetting.
评估本机构所使用的液体分配器的精密度和准确性。
共评估了15台分配器(8台微量和7台常量),类型包括自动、半自动或手动。它们的使用年限为0.5至7年。
如前所述,使用分析天平(Chio JP - 160)和去离子蒸馏水通过重量法确定分配的体积。微量分配器使用20微升和100微升的体积进行评估,常量分配器使用1毫升和5毫升的体积进行评估。每个分配器进行10次重复评估:用这10次重复计算平均值和变异系数(CV)。平均值转换为理论体积的百分比。因此,100%的准确率对应完美的准确性。一个重要的方法学方面是,这10次分配重复由分配器的惯常使用者亲自进行。
微量分配器的平均值和CV见表2,常量分配器的见表3。在表2和表3的总共25次评估中,有8次精密度较差(CV高于3%),还有8例存在较大的不准确情况(比例超出100±5%)。在这8例不准确情况中的4例(2台微量和2台常量),误差范围为10%至22%。除手动微量分配器在大多数情况下符合规格外,少数分配器符合制造商声称的精密度和准确性规格。我们将后者归因于手动分配器中缺乏机械装置。
如同之前对自动微量移液器的评估,我们发现大量移液系统在精密度和准确性方面不符合规格。4台分配器在准确性方面的误差幅度(10%至22%)在要求良好移液的方法中可能是灾难性的。