Suppr超能文献

[在弗留利-威尼斯朱利亚大区心血管疾病预防区域项目中,依据世界卫生组织标准对血脂测定方法进行标准化]

[Standardization of the methods of lipid determination according to WHO in the regional project of prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Friuli-Venezia Giulia].

作者信息

Grafnetter D, Feruglio G A, Vanuzzo D

机构信息

Istituto di Cardiologia, Ospedale S.M. della Misericordia-Udine.

出版信息

G Ital Cardiol. 1996 Mar;26(3):287-97.

PMID:8690184
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recognition of dyslipidemias as a major modifiable risk factor for atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease underlines the need to obtain precise and accurate assay results of plasma lipids. Today the use of automatic laboratory methods and of internal quality control favours the precision of the results but does not guarantee accuracy. The efficiency of a laboratory can be ensured by a standardization programme, systematically monitoring precision and accuracy by means of independent internal and external quality control, international reference standards (e.g. those of CDC-NHLBI and WHO) and protocols to identify and reduce the errors due to biological variability and pre-analytical factors. After the foundation of the Regional Project for Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in Friuli-Venezia Giulia, a lipid standardization programme was set-up, covering the 20 chemico-clinical laboratories of the Region. The programme was directed by the International WHO-MONICA-Lipid Reference Centres of Prague-Udine.

METHODS

During the years 1993-1994, three sets of lyophilized human serum samples were dispatched to each laboratory for the blind evaluation of total cholesterol, triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol. The samples were obtained by the combination of three serum pools at least at different lipid concentration. The first set included 20 samples to be tested in 5 weeks, the second set included 30 samples to be tested in 8 weeks and the third set included 21 samples to be tested in 9 weeks. The assay results were sent to the Prague-Udine WHO-MONICA Centres where they were computerized and evaluated, particularly considering precision for each set, estimated by the variation coefficient (i.e. standard deviation/mean value of the measurements per cent) and accuracy (the bias was computed as mean of the measurement minus the reference value/reference value per cent).

RESULTS

In the three assay series for total cholesterol, almost all the laboratories showed the variation co-efficient (precision) to be less than the WHO-MONICA limit of 3.7% (for a cholesterol level of 250 mg) (Tab. II) and in 8 cases out of 20, less than the CDC limit of 3%; the accuracy bias was less than the WHO-MONICA limit of 5% in 17 laboratories out of 20 and less than the CDC limit of 3% in 11 cases out of 20. For the HDL-cholesterol standardization programme the reference values were based upon the phosphotungstate method. However, the pools were also controlled by the other precipitation methods used in the 20 participating laboratories: 11 laboratories worked within the WHO-MONICA limits of precision and accuracy (respectively 6.5% and 7.5%) in at least two of the three sets. Concerning triglycerides, the regional laboratories showed a greater variability and, though most of the variation coefficients were within the WHO-MONICA limit of 5%, half of the accuracy biases were greater than the limit of 10%. The bias of the measurement average of all the laboratories was excellent for total and HDL-cholesterol, not quite good but acceptable for triglycerides. Laboratory performance improved progressively from the first to the last set, on more than one occasion.

CONCLUSIONS

The lipid standardization experience carried out in the framework of the Regional Project for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease demonstrates that it is possible to set up a wide and co-ordinated collaboration with laboratories of an entire region with positive and improving results. For this global quality control system, the resource allocated is limited but widely rewarded by the community benefits in terms of assay reliability and savings at medical care level, basic research and population studies.

摘要

背景

血脂异常被认为是动脉粥样硬化和冠心病的主要可改变危险因素,这突出了获取血浆脂质精确且准确检测结果的必要性。如今,自动实验室方法和内部质量控制的应用提高了结果的精密度,但并不能保证准确性。通过标准化程序,借助独立的内部和外部质量控制、国际参考标准(如美国疾病控制与预防中心 - 国家心肺血液研究所和世界卫生组织的标准)以及识别和减少因生物变异性和分析前因素导致的误差的方案,可以确保实验室的效率。在弗留利 - 威尼斯朱利亚大区预防心血管疾病区域项目成立后,设立了一项血脂标准化计划,涵盖该地区的20个化学临床实验室。该计划由布拉格 - 乌迪内的世界卫生组织 - 莫妮卡血脂参考中心指导。

方法

在1993 - 1994年期间,向每个实验室发送了三组冻干人血清样本,用于对总胆固醇、甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇进行盲法评估。这些样本通过至少三种不同脂质浓度的血清池组合获得。第一组包括20个样本,需在5周内进行检测;第二组包括30个样本,需在8周内进行检测;第三组包括21个样本,需在9周内进行检测。检测结果被发送至布拉格 - 乌迪内世界卫生组织 - 莫妮卡中心,在那里进行计算机化处理和评估,特别考虑每组的精密度(通过变异系数估计,即测量值的标准偏差/测量平均值的百分比)和准确性(偏差计算为测量平均值减去参考值/参考值的百分比)。

结果

在总胆固醇的三个检测系列中,几乎所有实验室的变异系数(精密度)均低于世界卫生组织 - 莫妮卡设定的3.7%的限值(对于胆固醇水平为250mg时)(表二),20个实验室中有8个低于美国疾病控制与预防中心3%的限值;20个实验室中有17个的准确性偏差低于世界卫生组织 - 莫妮卡5%的限值,20个实验室中有11个低于美国疾病控制与预防中心3%的限值。对于高密度脂蛋白胆固醇标准化计划,参考值基于磷钨酸盐法。然而,这些样本池也由参与的20个实验室使用的其他沉淀法进行了检测:11个实验室在三个样本组中的至少两组中,其精密度和准确性(分别为6.5%和7.5%)处于世界卫生组织 - 莫妮卡的限值范围内。关于甘油三酯,该地区实验室显示出更大的变异性,尽管大多数变异系数在世界卫生组织 - 莫妮卡5%的限值范围内,但一半的准确性偏差大于10%的限值。所有实验室总胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇测量平均值的偏差情况良好,甘油三酯的偏差虽不太好但尚可接受。在不止一次的检测中,实验室的表现从第一组到最后一组逐渐改善。

结论

在预防心血管疾病区域项目框架内开展的血脂标准化经验表明,与整个地区的实验室建立广泛且协调的合作是可行的,并且能取得积极且不断改善的结果。对于这个全球质量控制系统,所分配的资源有限,但在检测可靠性以及医疗保健、基础研究和人群研究层面的节省等方面,社区所获得的益处给予了丰厚回报。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验