Violence & Society Research Group, School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XY, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 7;12:412. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-412.
To assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of a licensed premises intervention to reduce severe intoxication and disorder; to establish effect sizes and identify appropriate approaches to the development and maintenance of a rigorous research design and intervention implementation.
An exploratory two-armed parallel randomised controlled trial with a nested process evaluation. An audit of risk factors and a tailored action plan for high risk premises, with three month follow up audit and feedback. Thirty-two premises that had experienced at least one assault in the year prior to the intervention were recruited, match paired and randomly allocated to control or intervention group. Police violence data and data from a street survey of study premises' customers, including measures of breath alcohol concentration and surveyor rated customer intoxication, were used to assess effect sizes for a future definitive trial. A nested process evaluation explored implementation barriers and the fidelity of the intervention with key stakeholders and senior staff in intervention premises using semi-structured interviews.
The process evaluation indicated implementation barriers and low fidelity, with a reluctance to implement the intervention and to submit to a formal risk audit. Power calculations suggest the intervention effect on violence and subjective intoxication would be raised to significance with a study size of 517 premises.
It is methodologically feasible to conduct randomised controlled trials where licensed premises are the unit of allocation. However, lack of enthusiasm in senior premises staff indicates the need for intervention enforcement, rather than voluntary agreements, and on-going strategies to promote sustainability.
UKCRN 7090; ISRCTN: 80875696.
评估许可场所干预减少严重醉酒和混乱的随机对照试验的可行性;确定效果大小,并确定开发和维护严格研究设计和干预实施的适当方法。
一项探索性的、两臂平行的随机对照试验,嵌套了一个过程评估。对风险因素进行审计,并为高风险场所制定定制行动计划,进行为期三个月的后续审计和反馈。招募了 32 家在前一年至少经历过一次袭击的场所,将其配对并随机分配到对照组或干预组。使用警察暴力数据和对研究场所顾客进行的街头调查数据,包括呼吸酒精浓度测量和调查员评定的顾客醉酒程度,评估未来确定性试验的效果大小。嵌套过程评估使用半结构化访谈,探索实施障碍和干预措施在干预场所的关键利益相关者和高级员工中的保真度。
过程评估表明存在实施障碍和低保真度,对实施干预和接受正式风险审计存在抵触情绪。功效计算表明,随着 517 个场所的研究规模,干预对暴力和主观醉酒的影响将提高到显著性水平。
在许可场所作为分配单位的情况下,进行随机对照试验在方法学上是可行的。然而,高级场所员工缺乏积极性表明需要采取干预措施执行,而不是自愿协议,并需要持续的策略来促进可持续性。
英国临床试验注册中心 7090;ISRCTN: 80875696。