Consortium to Lower Obesity in Chicago Children, Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jun 7;9:68. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-68.
Understanding of physical activity (PA) tracking during childhood is important to predict PA behaviors and design appropriate interventions. We compared tracking of PA according to PA level and type of day (weekday/weekend) in a pool of five children's cohort studies.
Data from ALSPAC, CLAN, Iowa Bone Development Study, HEAPS, PEACH were extracted from the International Children's Accelerometry Database (ICAD), resulting in 5,016 participants with age, gender, and accelerometry data at both baseline and follow-up (mean age: 10.3 years at baseline, 12.5 years at follow-up). Daily minutes spent in moderate- and vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA) and vigorous-intensity PA (VPA) was categorized into quintiles. Multinomial logistic regression models were fit to predict follow-up (M)VPA from baseline (M)VPA (reference: 20- < 80%tile), age at follow-up, and follow-up duration.
For the weekday, VPA tracking for boys with high baseline VPA was higher than boys with low baseline VPA (ORs: 3.9 [95% CI: 3.1, 5.0] vs. 2.1 [95% CI: 1.6, 2.6]). Among girls, high VPA was less stable when compared low VPA (ORs: 1.8 [95% CI: 1.4, 2.2] vs. 2.6 [95% CI: 2.1, 3.2]). The pattern was similar for MVPA among girls (ORs: 1.6 [95% CI: 1.2, 2.0] vs. 2.8 [95% CI: 2.3, 3.6]). Overall, tracking was lower for the weekend.
PA tracking was higher on the weekday than the weekend, and among inactive girls than active girls. The PA "routine" of weekdays should be used to help children establish healthy PA patterns. Supports for PA increase and maintenance of girls are needed.
了解儿童时期的身体活动(PA)追踪对于预测 PA 行为和设计适当的干预措施很重要。我们比较了五个儿童队列研究中根据 PA 水平和白天类型(工作日/周末)进行的 PA 追踪。
从国际儿童加速度计数据库(ICAD)中提取了来自 ALSPAC、CLAN、爱荷华骨骼发育研究、HEAPS 和 PEACH 的数据,结果共有 5016 名参与者具有基线和随访时的年龄、性别和加速度计数据(平均年龄:基线时 10.3 岁,随访时 12.5 岁)。将中等到剧烈强度 PA(MVPA)和剧烈强度 PA(VPA)的每日分钟数分为五分位数。使用多项逻辑回归模型从基线 MVPA(M)预测随访 MVPA(M)(参考:20-<80%分位)、随访时年龄和随访持续时间。
对于工作日,高基线 VPA 的男孩的 VPA 追踪高于低基线 VPA 的男孩(ORs:3.9 [95%CI:3.1, 5.0] vs. 2.1 [95%CI:1.6, 2.6])。在女孩中,与低 VPA 相比,高 VPA 不太稳定(ORs:1.8 [95%CI:1.4, 2.2] vs. 2.6 [95%CI:2.1, 3.2])。女孩的 MVPA 也存在类似的模式(ORs:1.6 [95%CI:1.2, 2.0] vs. 2.8 [95%CI:2.3, 3.6])。总的来说,周末的追踪效果较低。
工作日的 PA 追踪高于周末,不活跃女孩的 PA 追踪低于活跃女孩。应该利用工作日的 PA“常规”来帮助孩子建立健康的 PA 模式。需要增加对女孩 PA 的支持,并维持其积极性。